Cited by 140Bipolar Disorder and TreatmentPersonality Disorders and PsychopathologySchizophrenia research and treatment

Staying Well with Bipolar Disorder

Russell, Sarah J., Browne, Jan L.·2005·Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective The research aimed to investigate how people diagnosed with bipolar mood disorder avoided episodes of illness and managed to stay well. The research also examined the role that personal, social and environmental factors played in helping people with bipolar mood disorder to stay well. Method This project used a combination of qualitative research methods. The design contained three (3) components: recruitment from general community, preliminary written questionnaire and semistructured interviews. To meet the criteria for inclusion, the participant must have stayed well for the past 2 years. The two main analytical categories were 'stay well concept' and 'strategies to stay well'. The main category 'strategies to stay well' contained a number of subcategories. These subcategories were acceptance of diagnosis, mindfulness, education, identify triggers, recognize warning signals, manage sleep and stress, make lifestyle changes, treatment, access support, and stay well plans. Results 100 people were eligible for inclusion in the study. The sample included 63 women and 37 men. The ages ranged from 18 to 83 years, with 86% over the age of 30. Duration of time since last episode of illness ranged from 2 years to >50 years. In the sample, 76% of participants were in paid employment. In addition, 36% of participants were parents. Participants actively managed bipolar disorder by developing a range of strategies to stay well. These strategies were based on participants' indiv…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/j.1440-1614.2005.01542.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 35 · Cited by 140

Authors
Russell, S. J., & Browne, J. L.
Affiliations
  • Research Matters, PO Box 1235, North Fitzroy, 3068, Victoria, Australia
  • Deakin University (AU)
Corresponding author
Russell, Sarah J.
Venue
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2005-03
Volume
39
Issue
3
Pages
187-193
ISSN
  • 0004-8674 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-1614
OpenAlex
W2091306026
Cited by
140
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 16
FWCI
3.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
bipolar disorder, illness management, diagnosis acceptance, mindfulness, trigger identification, warning signs, sleep management, stress management, lifestyle modification, medication adherence, social support networks, relapse prevention
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Bipolar Disorder, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Self Care, Sick Role, Social Environment, Social Support, Victoria, Secondary Prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review