Cited by 113Maternal and fetal healthcarePregnancy and preeclampsia studiesMaternal and Perinatal Health Interventions

Placental abruption in term pregnancies: clinical significance and obstetric risk factors

Sheiner, E., Shoham-Vardi, I., Hallak, M., Hadar, A., Gortzak-Uzan, L., Katz, M., Mazor, M.·2003·The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence, obstetric risk factors and pregnancy outcome of placental abruption at term. METHODS: A comparison of all singleton term deliveries (> or = 37 weeks' gestation) complicated with placental abruption to singleton term deliveries without placental abruption. Multivariate analysis was performed to investigate independent risk factors for placental abruption. RESULTS: Placental abruption complicated 0.3% of all term deliveries (n = 72,995). A multiple logistic regression model with backward elimination found the following factors to be independently associated with the occurrence of placental abruption in term pregnancies: pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH), intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), non-vertex presentation, hydramnios and advanced maternal age. Perinatal mortality was significantly higher in pregnancies complicated with placental abruption (OR = 30.0, 95% CI 19.7-45.6; p < 0.001). In order to assess whether the increased risk for perinatal mortality was due to the placental abruption or to its significant association with other risk factors, a multivariate analysis was constructed with perinatal mortality as the outcome variable. Placental abruption (OR = 50.5, 95% CI 32.2-79.1), cord prolapse, small for gestational age and congenital malformations were found to be independent risk factors for perinatal mortality. CONCLUSION: Abruption of the placenta at term was found to be significantly associated with PIH, non-vertex presentation, IUGR, hydramnios and advanced maternal age. Owing to the independent association found between placental abruption and perinatal mortality, these conditions should be carefully evaluated in order to reduce the occurrence of placental abruption.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/jmf.13.1.45.49

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pregnancy-induced hypertension and nonvertex presentations are associated with abruption across all gestations.

    “This overlapping profile was also seen by Sheiner and colleagues who found that pregnancy-induced hypertension and nonvertex presentations were associated with abruption across all gestations whereas previous second-trimester bleeding was strongly associated with term abruption and polyhydramnios was strongly associated with preterm abruption (47, 48).”
  • Polyhydramnios is strongly associated with preterm abruption.

    “This overlapping profile was also seen by Sheiner and colleagues who found that pregnancy-induced hypertension and nonvertex presentations were associated with abruption across all gestations whereas previous second-trimester bleeding was strongly associated with term abruption and polyhydramnios was strongly associated with preterm abruption (47, 48).”
  • Previous second-trimester bleeding is strongly associated with term abruption.

    “This overlapping profile was also seen by Sheiner and colleagues who found that pregnancy-induced hypertension and nonvertex presentations were associated with abruption across all gestations whereas previous second-trimester bleeding was strongly associated with term abruption and polyhydramnios was strongly associated with preterm abruption (47, 48).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 15 · Cited by 113

Authors
Sheiner, E., Shoham-Vardi, I., Hallak, M., Hadar, A., Gortzak-Uzan, L., Katz, M., & Mazor, M.
Affiliations
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (IL)
Venue
The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine
Published
2003-01
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
45-49
ISSN
  • 1476-4954 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-7058
OpenAlex
W1991956048
Cited by
113
References
15
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 9
FWCI
3.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and fetal healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Keywords
placental abruption, term pregnancy, prenatal risk factors, perinatal mortality, gestational hypertension, fetal growth restriction, polyhydramnios, advanced maternal age, cord prolapse, small for gestational age, congenital malformations
MeSH terms
Abruptio Placentae, Adult, Female, Fetal Growth Retardation, Humans, Polyhydramnios, Hypertension, Labor, Obstetric, Labor Presentation, Maternal Age, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular, Pregnancy Outcome, Risk Factors, Multivariate Analysis, Pregnancy, High-Risk

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review