Placental abruption in term pregnancies: clinical significance and obstetric risk factors
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence, obstetric risk factors and pregnancy outcome of placental abruption at term. METHODS: A comparison of all singleton term deliveries (> or = 37 weeks' gestation) complicated with placental abruption to singleton term deliveries without placental abruption. Multivariate analysis was performed to investigate independent risk factors for placental abruption. RESULTS: Placental abruption complicated 0.3% of all term deliveries (n = 72,995). A multiple logistic regression model with backward elimination found the following factors to be independently associated with the occurrence of placental abruption in term pregnancies: pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH), intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), non-vertex presentation, hydramnios and advanced maternal age. Perinatal mortality was significantly higher in pregnancies complicated with placental abruption (OR = 30.0, 95% CI 19.7-45.6; p < 0.001). In order to assess whether the increased risk for perinatal mortality was due to the placental abruption or to its significant association with other risk factors, a multivariate analysis was constructed with perinatal mortality as the outcome variable. Placental abruption (OR = 50.5, 95% CI 32.2-79.1), cord prolapse, small for gestational age and congenital malformations were found to be independent risk factors for perinatal mortality. CONCLUSION: Abruption of the placenta at term was found to be significantly associated with PIH, non-vertex presentation, IUGR, hydramnios and advanced maternal age. Owing to the independent association found between placental abruption and perinatal mortality, these conditions should be carefully evaluated in order to reduce the occurrence of placental abruption.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Pregnancy-induced hypertension and nonvertex presentations are associated with abruption across all gestations.
“This overlapping profile was also seen by Sheiner and colleagues who found that pregnancy-induced hypertension and nonvertex presentations were associated with abruption across all gestations whereas previous second-trimester bleeding was strongly associated with term abruption and polyhydramnios was strongly associated with preterm abruption (47, 48).”
From Placental abruption at near-term and term gestations: Pathophysiology, epidemiology, diagnosis, and management (2023) · cites this paper as [48]
Polyhydramnios is strongly associated with preterm abruption.
“This overlapping profile was also seen by Sheiner and colleagues who found that pregnancy-induced hypertension and nonvertex presentations were associated with abruption across all gestations whereas previous second-trimester bleeding was strongly associated with term abruption and polyhydramnios was strongly associated with preterm abruption (47, 48).”
From Placental abruption at near-term and term gestations: Pathophysiology, epidemiology, diagnosis, and management (2023) · cites this paper as [48]
Previous second-trimester bleeding is strongly associated with term abruption.
“This overlapping profile was also seen by Sheiner and colleagues who found that pregnancy-induced hypertension and nonvertex presentations were associated with abruption across all gestations whereas previous second-trimester bleeding was strongly associated with term abruption and polyhydramnios was strongly associated with preterm abruption (47, 48).”
From Placental abruption at near-term and term gestations: Pathophysiology, epidemiology, diagnosis, and management (2023) · cites this paper as [48]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 15 · Cited by 113
- Authors
- Sheiner, E., Shoham-Vardi, I., Hallak, M., Hadar, A., Gortzak-Uzan, L., Katz, M., & Mazor, M.
- Affiliations
- Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (IL)
- Venue
- The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 45-49
- ISSN
- 1476-4954 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-7058
- OpenAlex
- W1991956048
- Cited by
- 113
- References
- 15
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 3.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and fetal healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
- Keywords
- placental abruption, term pregnancy, prenatal risk factors, perinatal mortality, gestational hypertension, fetal growth restriction, polyhydramnios, advanced maternal age, cord prolapse, small for gestational age, congenital malformations
- MeSH terms
- Abruptio Placentae, Adult, Female, Fetal Growth Retardation, Humans, Polyhydramnios, Hypertension, Labor, Obstetric, Labor Presentation, Maternal Age, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular, Pregnancy Outcome, Risk Factors, Multivariate Analysis, Pregnancy, High-Risk
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review