CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 19

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Treatment of Textile Effluents by H2O2/UV Oxidation Combined with RO Separation for Reuse

Kang, Shyh-Fang, Yen, Hsing-Yuan, Yang, Mu-Hoe·2003·Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A
DOI 10.1081/ese-120021129
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This study evaluates the feasibility of the treatment of textile effluents by H2O2/UV oxidation combined with reverse osmosis (RO) membrane separation for water reuse in textile dying processes. The results showed that the conductivity of textile effluents was from 2340 to 4560 micros/cm. Addition of auxiliary chemicals used during the dyeing processes increased the conductivity in textile wastewaters. The H2O2/UV pre-oxidation of textile effluents can mineralize or oxidize dissolved organic carbon (DOC) effectively. However, the removal of conductivity and hardness were poor. Pretreatment of the textile effluent by H2O2/UV oxidation can decrease silt density index (SDI) values and osmotic pressure and increase permeate flux when followed by RO separation. H2O2/UV pre-oxidation and RO post-treatment can improve the textile effluent quality and meet the water quality criteria for water reuse in the textile industry. In conclusion, the combined H2O2/UV pre-oxidation and RO post-process is a promising treatment for textile effluents for water reuse.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1081/ese-120021129

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. 10.1016/S0273-1223(97)00707-5 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/S0011-9164(97)00058-1 · DOI
  3. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4660(199808)72:4<289::AID-JCTB905>3.0.CO;2-# · DOI
  4. 10.1016/S0273-1223(99)00524-7 · DOI
  5. Bergna, G., Bianchi, R. and Malpei, F. 1998. GAC adsorption of ozonated secondary textile effluents for water industrial reuse. Proceedings of Advanced Wastewater Treatment Conference on Recycling and Reuse. Sept14–161998, Fiera Milano, Italy. pp.839–846.
  6. Coulter S.L., 1996, Ultrapure Water, 13, 54
  7. 10.1016/S0045-6535(99)00068-5 · DOI
  8. Ince N.H., 1997, Environ. Technol., 18, 179, 10.1080/09593330.1997.9618484 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/S0143-7208(99)00035-2 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/S0304-3894(99)00005-9 · DOI
  11. 10.1089/ees.2000.17.9 · DOI
  12. 10.1021/es00012a018 · DOI
  13. 10.1039/tf9575300344 · DOI
  14. 10.1021/ja01525a004 · DOI
  15. 1995, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater,
  16. Ciardelli, G. and Ranieri, N. 1998. Water recycling in the textile industry: Several case studies. Proceedings of Advanced Wastewater Treatment Conference on Recycling and Reuse. Sept14–161998, Fiera Milano, Italy. pp.847–854.
  17. 10.1016/S0273-1223(99)00381-9 · DOI
  18. Bates W.T., 1988, Ultrapure Water, 5, 34
  19. 10.1016/S0011-9164(97)00052-0 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kang, S.-F., Yen, H.-Y., & Yang, M.-H.
Venue
Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2003-07
Volume
38
Issue
7
Pages
1327-1339
ISSN
  • 1093-4529
  • 1532-4117
DOI
10.1081/ese-120021129
Cited by
19
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review