Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 412

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Thermodynamics of Protein–Ligand Interactions: History, Presence, and Future Aspects

Perozzo, Remo, Folkers, Gerd, Scapozza, Leonardo·2004·Journal of Receptors and Signal Transduction

Abstract

The understanding of molecular recognition processes of small ligands and biological macromolecules requires a complete characterization of the binding energetics and correlation of thermodynamic data with interacting structures involved. A quantitative description of the forces that govern molecular associations requires determination of changes of all thermodynamic parameters, including free energy of binding (deltaG), enthalpy (deltaH), and entropy (deltaS) of binding and the heat capacity change (deltaCp). A close insight into the binding process is of significant and practical interest, since it provides the fundamental know-how for development of structure-based molecular design-strategies. The only direct method to measure the heat change during complex formation at constant temperature is provided by isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC). With this method one binding partner is titrated into a solution containing the interaction partner, thereby generating or absorbing heat. This heat is the direct observable that can be quantified by the calorimeter. The use of ITC has been limited due to the lack of sensitivity, but recent developments in instrument design permit to measure heat effects generated by nanomol (typically 10-100) amounts of reactants. ITC has emerged as the primary tool for characterizing interactions in terms of thermodynamic parameters. Because heat changes occur in almost all chemical and biochemical processes, ITC can be used for numerous applications, e.g., binding studies of antibody-antigen, protein-peptide, protein-protein, enzyme-inhibitor or enzyme-substrate, carbohydrate-protein, DNA-protein (and many more) interactions as well as enzyme kinetics. Under appropriate conditions data analysis from a single experiment yields deltaH, K(B), the stoichiometry (n), deltaG and deltaS of binding. Moreover, ITC experiments performed at different temperatures yield the heat capacity change (deltaCp). The informational content of thermodynamic data is large, and it has been shown that it plays an important role in the elucidation of binding mechanisms and, through the link to structural data, also in rational drug design. In this review we will present a comprehensive overview to ITC by giving some historical background to calorimetry, outline some critical experimental and data analysis aspects, discuss the latest developments, and give three recent examples of studies published with respect to macromolecule-ligand interactions that have utilized ITC technology.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1081/rrs-120037896

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 412

Metadata

Authors
Perozzo, R., Folkers, G., & Scapozza, L.
Venue
Journal of Receptors and Signal Transduction
Published
2004-01
Volume
24
Issue
1-2
Pages
1-52
ISSN
  • 1079-9893 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-4281
OpenAlex
W2151919617
Cited by
412
References
0
FWCI
4.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Thermodynamics of Protein–Ligand Interactions: History, Presence, and Future Aspects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1081/rrs-120037896
The paper
Perozzo, R., Folkers, G., & Scapozza, L. (2004). Thermodynamics of Protein–Ligand Interactions: History, Presence, and Future Aspects. Journal of Receptors and Signal Transduction. https://doi.org/10.1081/rrs-120037896

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.