The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparative characterization of the 21-kD and 26-kD gap junction proteins in murine liver and cultured hepatocytes.
Open accessAbstract
Affinity-purified antibodies to mouse liver 26- and 21-kD gap junction proteins have been used to characterize gap junctions in liver and cultured hepatocytes. Both proteins are colocalized in the same gap junction plaques as shown by double immunofluorescence and immunoelectron microscopy. In the lobules of rat liver, the 21-kD immunoreactivity is detected as a gradient of fluorescent spots on apposing plasma membranes, the maximum being in the periportal zone and a faint reaction in the perivenous zone. In contrast, the 26-kD immunoreactivity is evenly distributed in fluorescent spots on apposing plasma membranes throughout the rat liver lobule. Immunoreactive sites with anti-21 kD shown by immunofluorescence are also present in exocrine pancreas, proximal tubules of the kidney, and the epithelium of small intestine. The 21-kD immunoreactivity was not found in thin sections of myocardium and adult brain cortex. Subsequent to partial rat hepatectomy, both the 26- and 21-kD proteins first decrease and after approximately 2 d increase again. By comparison of the 26- and 21-kD immunoreactivity in cultured embryonic mouse hepatocytes, we found (a) the same pattern of immunoreactivity on apposing plasma membranes and colocalization within the same plaque, (b) a similar decrease after 1 d and subsequent increase after 3 d of both proteins, (c) cAMP-dependent in vitro phosphorylation of the 26-kD but not of the 21-kD protein, and (d) complete inhibition of intercellular transfer of Lucifer Yellow in all hepatocytes microinjected with anti-26 kD and, in most cases, partial inhibition of dye transfer after injection of anti-21 kD. Our results indicate that both the 26-kD and the 21-kD proteins are functional gap junction proteins.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Gap Junction Communication Channel
Kumar, N. M., & Gilula, N. B. (1996) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81282-9 · Cited by 1,917
Connections with Connexins: the Molecular Basis of Direct Intercellular Signaling
Bruzzone, R., White, T. W., & Paul, D. L. (1996) · European Journal of Biochemistry · doi:10.1111/j.1432-1033.1996.0001q.x · Cited by 1,302
Musil, L. S., Cunningham, B. A., Edelman, G. M., & Goodenough, D. A. (1990) · The Journal of cell biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.111.5.2077 · Cited by 693
Metabolic zonation of the liver: Regulation and implications for liver function
Gebhardt, R. (1992) · Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/0163-7258(92)90055-5 · Cited by 607
Zonation of parenchymal and nonparenchymal metabolism in liver.
Jungermann, K., & Keitzmann, T. (1996) · Annual Review of Nutrition · doi:10.1146/annurev.nu.16.070196.001143 · Cited by 589
Metadata
- Authors
- Traub, O., Look, J., Dermietzel, R., Brümmer, F., Hülser, D., & Willecke, K.
- Venue
- The Journal of cell biology
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 1989-03-01
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1039-1051
- ISSN
- 0021-9525 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-8140
- OpenAlex
- W1992689315
- Cited by
- 339
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative characterization of the 21-kD and 26-kD gap junction proteins in murine liver and cultured hepatocytes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1083/jcb.108.3.1039
- The paper
- Traub, O., Look, J., Dermietzel, R., Brümmer, F., Hülser, D., & Willecke, K. (1989). Comparative characterization of the 21-kD and 26-kD gap junction proteins in murine liver and cultured hepatocytes. The Journal of cell biology. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.108.3.1039
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.