The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sequence and tissue distribution of a second protein of hepatic gap junctions, Cx26, as deduced from its cDNA.
Open accessAbstract
While a number of different gap junction proteins have now been identified, hepatic gap junctions are unique in being the first demonstrated case where two homologous, but distinct, proteins (28,000 and 21,000 Mr) are found within a single gap junctional plaque (Nicholson, B. J., R. Dermietzel, D. Teplow, O. Traub, K. Willecke, and J.-P. Revel. 1987. Nature [Lond.]. 329:732-734). The cDNA for the major 28,000-Mr component has been cloned (Paul, D. L. 1986. J. Cell Biol. 103:123-134) (Kumar, N. M., and N. B. Gilula. 1986. J. Cell Biol. 103:767-776) and, based on its deduced formula weight of 32,007, has been designated connexin 32 (or Cx32 as used here). We now report the selection and characterization of clones for the second 21,000-Mr protein using an oligonucleotide derived from the amino-terminal protein sequence. Together the cDNAs represent 2.4 kb of the single 2.5-kb message detected in Northern blots. An open reading frame of 678 bp coding for a protein with a calculated molecular mass of 26,453 D was identified. Overall sequence homology with Cx32 and Cx43 (64 and 51% amino acid identities, respectively) and a similar predicted tertiary structure confirm that this protein forms part of the connexin family and is consequently referred to as Cx26. Consistent with observations on Cx43 (Beyer, E. C., D. L. Paul, and D. A. Goodenough. 1987. J. Cell Biol. 105:2621-2629) the most marked divergence between Cx26 and other members of the family lies in the sequence of the cytoplasmic domains. The Cx26 gene is present as a single copy per haploid genome in rat and, based on Southern blots, appears to contain at least one intron outside the open reading frame. Northern blots indicate that Cx32 and Cx26 are typically coexpressed, messages for both having been identified in liver, kidney, intestine, lung, spleen, stomach, testes, and brain, but not heart and adult skeletal muscle. This raises the interesting prospect of having differential modes of regulating intercellular channels within a given tissue and, at least in the case of liver, a given cell.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kozak, M. (1986) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(86)90762-2 · Cited by 4,741
Cited by
Musil, L. S., Cunningham, B. A., Edelman, G. M., & Goodenough, D. A. (1990) · The Journal of cell biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.111.5.2077 · Cited by 693
Wu, J. C., Merlino, G., & Fausto, N. (1994) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.91.2.674 · Cited by 317
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, J. T., & Nicholson, B. J.
- Venue
- The Journal of cell biology
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 1989-12-01
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 3391-3401
- ISSN
- 0021-9525 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-8140
- OpenAlex
- W2064692804
- Cited by
- 415
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sequence and tissue distribution of a second protein of hepatic gap junctions, Cx26, as deduced from its cDNA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1083/jcb.109.6.3391
- The paper
- Zhang, J. T., & Nicholson, B. J. (1989). Sequence and tissue distribution of a second protein of hepatic gap junctions, Cx26, as deduced from its cDNA. The Journal of cell biology. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.109.6.3391
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.