The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Scrapie and cellular prion proteins differ in their kinetics of synthesis and topology in cultured cells.
Open accessAbstract
Both the cellular and scrapie isoforms of the prion protein (PrP) designated PrPc and PrPSc are encoded by a single-copy chromosomal gene and appear to be translated from the same 2.1-kb mRNA. PrPC can be distinguished from PrPSc by limited proteolysis under conditions where PrPC is hydrolyzed and PrPSc is resistant. We report here that PrPC can be released from the surface of both normal-control and scrapie-infected murine neuroblastoma (N2a) cells by phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C (PIPLC) digestion and it can be selectively labeled with sulfo-NHS-biotin, a membrane impermeant reagent. In contrast, PrPSc was neither released by PIPLC nor labeled with sulfo-NHS-biotin. Pulse-chase experiments showed that [35S]methionine was incorporated almost immediately into PrPC while incorporation into PrPSc molecules was observed only during the chase period. While PrPC is synthesized and degraded relatively rapidly (t1/2 approximately 5 h), PrPSc is synthesized slowly (t1/2 approximately 15 h) and appears to accumulate. These results are consistent with several observations previously made on rodent brains where PrP mRNA and PrPC levels did not change throughout the course of scrapie infection, yet PrPSc accumulated to levels exceeding that of PrPC. Our kinetic studies demonstrate that PrPSc is derived from a protease-sensitive precursor and that the acquisition of proteinase K resistance results from a posttranslational event. Whether or not prolonged incubation periods, which are a cardinal feature of prion diseases, reflect the slow synthesis of PrPSc remains to be established.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Prusiner, S. B. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.23.13363 · Cited by 5,373
Self-citationPrion Diseases of Humans and Animals: Their Causes and Molecular Basis
Collinge, J. (2001) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.519 · Cited by 1,344
Predicted alpha-helical regions of the prion protein when synthesized as peptides form amyloid.
Gasset, M., Baldwin, M. A., Lloyd, D. H., Gabriel, J. M., Holtzman, D. M., Cohen, F., Fletterick, R., & Prusiner, S. B. (1992) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.89.22.10940 · Cited by 329
Self-citationPrusiner, S. B., & Hsiao, K. K. (1994) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.410350404 · Cited by 328
Self-citationA systematic review of prion therapeutics in experimental models
Trevitt, C. R. (2006) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awl150 · Cited by 263
Metadata
- Authors
- Borchelt, D. R., Scott, M., Taraboulos, A., Stahl, N., & Prusiner, S. B.
- Venue
- The Journal of cell biology
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 1990-03-01
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 743-752
- ISSN
- 0021-9525 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-8140
- OpenAlex
- W2167503783
- Cited by
- 504
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Scrapie and cellular prion proteins differ in their kinetics of synthesis and topology in cultured cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1083/jcb.110.3.743
- The paper
- Borchelt, D. R., Scott, M., Taraboulos, A., Stahl, N., & Prusiner, S. B. (1990). Scrapie and cellular prion proteins differ in their kinetics of synthesis and topology in cultured cells. The Journal of cell biology. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.110.3.743
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.