The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Elements of error correction in mitosis: microtubule capture, release, and tension.
Open accessAbstract
The correction of certain errors in mitosis requires capture and release: new kinetochore microtubules must be captured and old, misdirected ones must be released. We studied capture and release in living grasshopper spermatocytes. Capture is remarkably efficient over a broad range in the angle at which a microtubule encounters a kinetochore. However, capture is inefficient when kinetochores point directly away from the source of properly directed microtubules. Capture in that situation is required for correction of the most common error; microtubule-kinetochore encounters are improbable and capture occurs only once every 8 min, on average. Release from the improper attachment caused by misdirected microtubules allows kinetochore movement and the completion of error correction. We tugged on kinetochores with a micromanipulation needle and found they are free to move less than one time in two. Thus error correction depends on two improbable events, capture and release, and they must happen by chance to coincide. In spermatocytes this will occur only once every 18 min, on average, but a leisurely cell cycle provides ample time. Capture and release generate only change, not perfection. Tension from mitotic forces brings change to a halt by stabilizing the one correct attachment of chromosomes to the spindle. We show that tension directly affects stability, rather than merely constraining kinetochore position. This implies that chromosomes are attached to the spindle by tension-sensitive linkers whose stability is necessary for proper chromosome distribution but whose loss is necessary for the correction of errors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Nasmyth, K. (2001) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.35.102401.091334 · Cited by 805
Tanaka, T. U., Rachidi, N., Janke, C., Pereira, G., Galova, M., Schiebel, E., Stark, M. J. R., & Nasmyth, K. (2002) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00633-5 · Cited by 722
Force Generation by Microtubule Assembly/Disassembly in Mitosis and Related Movements
Inoué, S., & Salmon, E. D. (1995) · Molecular Biology of the Cell · doi:10.1091/mbc.6.12.1619 · Cited by 532
The spindle checkpoint: structural insights into dynamic signalling
Musacchio, A., & Hardwick, K. G. (2002) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm929 · Cited by 531
Tension directly stabilizes reconstituted kinetochore-microtubule attachments
Akiyoshi, B., Sarangapani, K. K., Powers, A. F., Nelson, C. R., Reichow, S. L., Arellano-Santoyo, H., Gonen, T., Ranish, J. A., Asbury, C. L., & Biggins, S. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09594 · Cited by 458
Metadata
- Authors
- Nicklas, R. B., & Ward, S. C.
- Venue
- The Journal of cell biology
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 1994-09-01
- Volume
- 126
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1241-1253
- ISSN
- 0021-9525 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-8140
- OpenAlex
- W2158169016
- Cited by
- 245
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Elements of error correction in mitosis: microtubule capture, release, and tension. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1083/jcb.126.5.1241
- The paper
- Nicklas, R. B., & Ward, S. C. (1994). Elements of error correction in mitosis: microtubule capture, release, and tension. The Journal of cell biology. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.126.5.1241
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.