The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dynamics of Myoblast Transplantation Reveal a Discrete Minority of Precursors with Stem Cell–like Properties as the Myogenic Source
Open accessAbstract
Myoblasts, the precursors of skeletal muscle fibers, can be induced to withdraw from the cell cycle and differentiate in vitro. Recent studies have also identified undifferentiated subpopulations that can self-renew and generate myogenic cells (Baroffio, A., M. Hamann, L. Bernheim, M.-L. Bochaton-Pillat, G. Gabbiani, and C.R. Bader. 1996. Differentiation. 60:47–57; Yoshida, N., S. Yoshida, K. Koishi, K. Masuda, and Y. Nabeshima. 1998. J. Cell Sci. 111:769–779). Cultured myoblasts can also differentiate and contribute to repair and new muscle formation in vivo, a capacity exploited in attempts to develop myoblast transplantation (MT) for genetic modification of adult muscle. Our studies of the dynamics of MT demonstrate that cultures of myoblasts contain distinct subpopulations defined by their behavior in vitro and divergent responses to grafting. By comparing a genomic and a semiconserved marker, we have followed the fate of myoblasts transplanted into muscles of dystrophic mice, finding that the majority of the grafted cells quickly die and only a minority are responsible for new muscle formation. This minority is behaviorally distinct, slowly dividing in tissue culture, but rapidly proliferative after grafting, suggesting a subpopulation with stem cell–like characteristics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Yoshida, N., Yoshida, S., Koishi, K., Masuda, K., & Nabeshima, Y.-I. (1998) · Journal of Cell Science · doi:10.1242/jcs.111.6.769 · Cited by 425
Cited by
Cellular and Molecular Regulation of Muscle Regeneration
CHARGÉ, S. B. P., & RUDNICKI, M. A. (2004) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00019.2003 · Cited by 2,680
Asymmetric self-renewal and commitment of satellite stem cells in muscle
Kuang, S., Kuroda, K., Le Grand, F., & Rudnicki, M. A. (2007) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.03.044 · Cited by 1,449
Function and Genetics of Dystrophin and Dystrophin-Related Proteins in Muscle
Blake, D. J., Weir, A., Newey, S. E., & Davies, K. E. (2002) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00028.2001 · Cited by 1,242
Direct Isolation of Satellite Cells for Skeletal Muscle Regeneration
Montarras, D., Morgan, J., Collins, C., Relaix, F., Zaffran, S., Cumano, A., Partridge, T., & Buckingham, M. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1114758 · Cited by 1,100
Self-citationExpression of Cd34 and Myf5 Defines the Majority of Quiescent Adult Skeletal Muscle Satellite Cells
Beauchamp, J. R., Heslop, L., Yu, D. S. W., Tajbakhsh, S., Kelly, R. G., Wernig, A., Buckingham, M. E., Partridge, T. A., & Zammit, P. S. (2000) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.151.6.1221 · Cited by 916
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Beauchamp, J. R., Morgan, J. E., Pagel, C. N., & Partridge, T. A.
- Venue
- The Journal of Cell Biology
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 1999-03-22
- Volume
- 144
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1113-1122
- ISSN
- 0021-9525 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-8140
- OpenAlex
- W2106220546
- Cited by
- 514
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dynamics of Myoblast Transplantation Reveal a Discrete Minority of Precursors with Stem Cell–like Properties as the Myogenic Source. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1083/jcb.144.6.1113
- The paper
- Beauchamp, J. R., Morgan, J. E., Pagel, C. N., & Partridge, T. A. (1999). Dynamics of Myoblast Transplantation Reveal a Discrete Minority of Precursors with Stem Cell–like Properties as the Myogenic Source. The Journal of Cell Biology. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.144.6.1113
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.