The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Separation of Propulsive and Adhesive Traction Stresses in Locomoting Keratocytes
Open accessAbstract
Strong, actomyosin-dependent, pinching tractions in steadily locomoting (gliding) fish keratocytes revealed by traction imaging present a paradox, since only forces perpendicular to the direction of locomotion are apparent, leaving the actual propulsive forces unresolved. When keratocytes become transiently “stuck” by their trailing edge and adopt a fibroblast-like morphology, the tractions opposing locomotion are concentrated into the tail, leaving the active pinching and propulsive tractions clearly visible under the cell body. Stuck keratocytes can develop ∼1 mdyn (10,000 pN) total propulsive thrust, originating in the wings of the cell. The leading lamella develops no detectable propulsive traction, even when the cell pulls on its transient tail anchorage. The separation of propulsive and adhesive tractions in the stuck phenotype leads to a mechanically consistent hypothesis that resolves the traction paradox for gliding keratocytes: the propulsive tractions driving locomotion are normally canceled by adhesive tractions resisting locomotion, leaving only the pinching tractions as a resultant. The resolution of the traction pattern into its components specifies conditions to be met for models of cytoskeletal force production, such as the dynamic network contraction model (Svitkina, T.M., A.B. Verkhovsky, K.M. McQuade, and G.G. Borisy. 1997. J. Cell Biol. 139:397–415). The traction pattern associated with cells undergoing sharp turns differs markedly from the normal pinching traction pattern, and can be accounted for by postulating an asymmetry in contractile activity of the opposed lateral wings of the cell.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Tissue Cells Feel and Respond to the Stiffness of Their Substrate
Discher, D. E., Janmey, P., & Wang, Y.-L. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1116995 · Cited by 6,382
Adhesion-Dependent Cell Mechanosensitivity
Bershadsky, A. D., Balaban, N. Q., & Geiger, B. (2003) · Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.cellbio.19.111301.153011 · Cited by 874
Adhesion assembly, disassembly and turnover in migrating cells – over and over and over again
Webb, D. J., Parsons, J. T., & Horwitz, A. F. (2002) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb0402-e97 · Cited by 757
Traction Force Microscopy of Migrating Normal and H-ras Transformed 3T3 Fibroblasts
Munevar, S., Wang, Y.-L., & Dembo, M. (2001) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/s0006-3495(01)76145-0 · Cited by 527
Self-citationElectromagnetic effects—From cell biology to medicine
Funk, R. H. W., Monsees, T., & Özkucur, N. (2009) · Progress in Histochemistry and Cytochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.proghi.2008.07.001 · Cited by 423
Metadata
- Authors
- Oliver, T., Dembo, M., & Jacobson, K.
- Venue
- The Journal of Cell Biology
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 1999-05-03
- Volume
- 145
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 589-604
- ISSN
- 0021-9525 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-8140
- OpenAlex
- W2100324155
- Cited by
- 163
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Separation of Propulsive and Adhesive Traction Stresses in Locomoting Keratocytes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1083/jcb.145.3.589
- The paper
- Oliver, T., Dembo, M., & Jacobson, K. (1999). Separation of Propulsive and Adhesive Traction Stresses in Locomoting Keratocytes. The Journal of Cell Biology. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.145.3.589
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.