The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Spatial organization of active and inactive genes and noncoding DNA within chromosome territories
Open accessAbstract
The position of genes within the nucleus has been correlated with their transcriptional activity. The interchromosome domain model of nuclear organization suggests that genes preferentially locate at the surface of chromosome territories. Conversely, high resolution analysis of chromatin fibers suggests that chromosome territories do not present accessibility barriers to transcription machinery. To clarify the relationship between the organization of chromosome territories and gene expression, we have used fluorescence in situ hybridization to analyze the spatial organization of a contiguous ∼1 Mb stretch of the Wilms' tumor, aniridia, genitourinary anomalies, mental retardation syndrome region of the human genome and the syntenic region in the mouse. These regions contain constitutively expressed genes, genes with tissue-restricted patterns of expression, and substantial regions of intergenic DNA. We find that there is a spatial organization within territories that is conserved between mouse and humans: certain sequences do preferentially locate at the periphery of the chromosome territories in both species. However, we do not detect genes necessarily at the periphery of chromosome territories or at the surface of subchromosomal domains. Intraterritory organization is not different among cell types that express different combinations of the genes under study. Our data demonstrate that transcription of both ubiquitous and tissue-restricted genes is not confined to the periphery of chromosome territories, suggesting that the basal transcription machinery and transcription factors can readily gain access to the chromosome interior.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Large-scale chromatin unfolding and remodeling induced by VP16 acidic activation domain
Tumbar, T., Sudlow, G., & Belmont, A. S. (1999) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.145.7.1341 · Cited by 351
Cited by
Nuclear organization of the genome and the potential for gene regulation
Fraser, P., & Bickmore, W. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05916 · Cited by 734
Self-citationInterchromosomal associations between alternatively expressed loci
Spilianakis, C. G., Lalioti, M. D., Town, T., Lee, G. R., & Flavell, R. A. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03574 · Cited by 730
Chambeyron, S., & Bickmore, W. A. (2004) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.292104 · Cited by 623
Self-citationChromosome territories – a functional nuclear landscape
Cremer, T., Cremer, M., Dietzel, S., Müller, S., Solovei, I., & Fakan, S. (2006) · Current Opinion in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2006.04.007 · Cited by 599
Splinter, E., de Wit, E., Nora, E. P., Klous, P., van de Werken, H. J. G., Zhu, Y., Kaaij, L. J. T., van IJcken, W., Gribnau, J., Heard, E., et al. (2011) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.633311 · Cited by 305
Metadata
- Authors
- Mahy, N. L., Perry, P. E., Gilchrist, S., Baldock, R. A., & Bickmore, W. A.
- Venue
- The Journal of Cell Biology
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 2002-05-06
- Volume
- 157
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 579-589
- ISSN
- 0021-9525 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-8140
- OpenAlex
- W2165997866
- Cited by
- 225
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spatial organization of active and inactive genes and noncoding DNA within chromosome territories. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1083/jcb.200111071
- The paper
- Mahy, N. L., Perry, P. E., Gilchrist, S., Baldock, R. A., & Bickmore, W. A. (2002). Spatial organization of active and inactive genes and noncoding DNA within chromosome territories. The Journal of Cell Biology. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200111071
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.