The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Figure manipulation
Open accessAbstract
The Journal of Cell Biology instituted electronic submission of manuscripts in December, 2001. Our brief experience in handling the review process electronically has raised an important issue regarding the manipulation of digital images that I would like to bring to the attention of the members of
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The Journal of Cell Biology was among the first to call attention to the problem of figure alteration in manuscripts (17)”
From The Prevalence of Inappropriate Image Duplication in Biomedical Research Publications (2016) · cites this paper as [17]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Our findings are consistent with the notion that greater scrutiny by journals can reduce the prevalence of problematic images.”
From The Prevalence of Inappropriate Image Duplication in Biomedical Research Publications (2016) · cites this paper as [17]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Prevalence of Inappropriate Image Duplication in Biomedical Research Publications
Bik, E. M., Casadevall, A., & Fang, F. C. (2016) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.00809-16 · Cited by 287
The Handbook of Journal Publishing
Morris, S., Barnas, E., LaFrenier, D., & Reich, M. M. (2013) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139107860 · Cited by 87
Bik, E. M., Fang, F. C., Kullas, A. L., Davis, R. J., & Casadevall, A. (2018) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.00309-18 · Cited by 55
Rossner, M. (2008) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.20081017220081203c · Cited by 52
Self-citationMcDonald, J. M., Cox, A. E., & Siegal, G. P. (2012) · American Journal Of Pathology · doi:10.1016/j.ajpath.2012.07.004 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Rossner, M.
- Affiliations
- Managing Editor, The Journal of Cell Biology
- Corresponding author
- Rossner, Mike
- ORCID
- Rossner, Mike
- Venue
- The Journal of Cell Biology
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 2002-09-30
- Volume
- 158
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1151-1151
- ISSN
- 0021-9525 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-8140
- PMC
- PMC2173234
- OpenAlex
- W1975151786
- Semantic Scholar
- 590cd3bfe3bc5f376be5717a446878d2c530a898
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2021: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- The Journal of Cell Biology (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Academic Writing and Publishing
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Academic Publishing and Open Access
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Publishing and Scholarly Communication
- Keywords
- image editing, scientific integrity, peer review, electronic manuscript submission, publication ethics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
