Cited by 333

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Rapidly inducible changes in phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate levels influence multiple regulatory functions of the lipid in intact living cells

Varnai, Peter, Thyagarajan, Baskaran, Rohacs, Tibor, Balla, Tamas·2006·The Journal of Cell Biology

Abstract

Rapamycin (rapa)-induced heterodimerization of the FRB domain of the mammalian target of rapa and FKBP12 was used to translocate a phosphoinositide 5-phosphatase (5-ptase) enzyme to the plasma membrane (PM) to evoke rapid changes in phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PtdIns(4,5)P2) levels. Rapa-induced PM recruitment of a truncated type IV 5-ptase containing only the 5-ptase domain fused to FKBP12 rapidly decreased PM PtdIns(4,5)P2 as monitored by the PLCδ1PH-GFP fusion construct. This decrease was paralleled by rapid termination of the ATP-induced Ca2+ signal and the prompt inactivation of menthol-activated transient receptor potential melastatin 8 (TRPM8) channels. Depletion of PM PtdIns(4,5)P2 was associated with a complete blockade of transferrin uptake and inhibition of epidermal growth factor internalization. None of these changes were observed upon rapa-induced translocation of an mRFP-FKBP12 fusion protein that was used as a control. These data demonstrate that rapid inducible depletion of PM PtdIns(4,5)P2 is a powerful tool to study the multiple regulatory roles of this phospholipid and to study differential sensitivities of various processes to PtdIns(4,5)P2 depletion.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1083/jcb.200607116

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. 1993, Nature., 365, 388, 10.1038/365388a0 · DOI
  2. 2001, J. Biol. Chem., 276, 15945, 10.1074/jbc.M011571200 · DOI
  3. 2001, J. Cell Biol., 154, 1007, 10.1083/jcb.200103107 · DOI
  4. 2006, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 103, 3422, 10.1073/pnas.0507710103 · DOI
  5. 2004, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 101, 10482, 10.1073/pnas.0403930101 · DOI
  6. 2004, Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol., 282, 117
  7. 2001, Science., 291, 1047, 10.1126/science.291.5506.1047 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 2000, J. Biol. Chem., 275, 20110, 10.1074/jbc.M910119199 · DOI
  9. 2000, J. Biol. Chem., 275, 24052, 10.1074/jbc.M000874200 · DOI
  10. 1994, J. Biol. Chem., 269, 21403, 10.1016/S0021-9258(17)31816-1 · DOI
  11. 2005, J. Neurosci., 25, 1674, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3632-04.2005 · DOI
  12. 1996, J. Biol. Chem., 271, 25316, 10.1074/jbc.271.41.25316 · DOI
  13. 2006, J. Cell Sci., 119, 571, 10.1242/jcs.02752 · DOI
  14. 1999, Mol. Cell. Biol., 19, 6845, 10.1128/MCB.19.10.6845 · DOI
  15. 2004, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 101, 14889, 10.1073/pnas.0405596101 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 2005, Nat. Neurosci., 8, 626, 10.1038/nn1451 · DOI
  17. 2002, Neuron., 35, 507, 10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00790-0 · DOI
  18. 2005, Curr. Opin. Neurobiol., 15, 370, 10.1016/j.conb.2005.05.005 · DOI
  19. 2004, J. Biol. Chem., 279, 38095, 10.1074/jbc.C400312200 · DOI
  20. 2004, EMBO J., 23, 3950, 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600387 · DOI
  21. 2005, J. Biol. Chem., 280, 39423, 10.1074/jbc.M503544200 · DOI
  22. 1997, Nature., 387, 673, 10.1038/42648 · DOI
  23. 2002, J. Biol. Chem., 277, 48876, 10.1074/jbc.M206271200 · DOI
  24. 2001, J. Biol. Chem., 276, 15337, 10.1074/jbc.M007194200 · DOI
  25. 1998, J. Cell Biol., 143, 501, 10.1083/jcb.143.2.501 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 102, 7859, 10.1073/pnas.0407535102 · DOI
  27. 2004, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 101, 8262, 10.1073/pnas.0401874101 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Varnai, P., Thyagarajan, B., Rohacs, T., & Balla, T.
Venue
The Journal of Cell Biology
Published
2006-11-06
Volume
175
Issue
3
Pages
377-382
ISSN
  • 1540-8140
  • 0021-9525
Cited by
333
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review