Cited by 107DNA Repair MechanismsGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsBacterial Genetics and Biotechnology

TopBP1 and DNA polymerase-α directly recruit the 9-1-1 complex to stalled DNA replication forks

Open access
Yan, Shan, Michael, W. Matthew·2009·Journal of Cell Biology

Abstract

TopBP1 and the Rad9–Rad1–Hus1 (9-1-1) complex activate the ataxia telangiectasia mutated and Rad3-related (ATR) protein kinase at stalled replication forks. ATR is recruited to stalled forks through its binding partner, ATR-interacting protein (ATRIP); however, it is unclear how TopBP1 and 9-1-1 are recruited so that they may join ATR–ATRIP and initiate signaling. In this study, we use Xenopus laevis egg extracts to determine the requirements for 9-1-1 loading. We show that TopBP1 is required for the recruitment of both 9-1-1 and DNA polymerase (pol)-α to sites of replication stress. Furthermore, we show that pol-α is also directly required for Rad9 loading. Our study identifies an assembly pathway, which is controlled by TopBP1 and includes pol-α, that mediates the loading of the 9-1-1 complex onto stalled replication forks. These findings clarify early events in the assembly of checkpoint signaling complexes on DNA and identify TopBP1 as a critical sensor of replication stress.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1083/jcb.200810185

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 51 · Cited by 107

Authors
Yan, S., & Michael, W. M.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Michael, W. Matthew
Venue
Journal of Cell Biology
Published
2009-03-16
Volume
184
Issue
6
Pages
793-804
ISSN
  • 0021-9525 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-8140
OpenAlex
W2109910662
Cited by
107
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • The Journal of Cell Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM 067735, R01GM067735)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
Keywords
TopBP1, 9-1-1 complex, DNA polymerase alpha, replication fork stalling, replication stress, ATR signaling, ATRIP, DNA damage checkpoint, Xenopus egg extracts
MeSH terms
Animals, Carrier Proteins, Chromatin, Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone, Cloning, Molecular, DNA, DNA Polymerase I, DNA Replication, DNA-Binding Proteins, Stress, Physiological, Time Factors, Xenopus laevis, Signal Transduction, Mutagenesis, Site-Directed, Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases, Cell Cycle Proteins, Tumor Suppressor Proteins, Xenopus Proteins, Multiprotein Complexes, Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review