Cited by 121DNA Repair MechanismsDiffusion and Search DynamicsGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics

Stochastic and reversible assembly of a multiprotein DNA repair complex ensures accurate target site recognition and efficient repair

Open access
Luijsterburg, Martijn S., von Bornstaedt, Gesa, Gourdin, Audrey M., Politi, Antonio Z., Moné, Martijn J., Warmerdam, Daniël O., Goedhart, Joachim, Vermeulen, Wim +2 more·2010·Journal of Cell Biology

Abstract

To understand how multiprotein complexes assemble and function on chromatin, we combined quantitative analysis of the mammalian nucleotide excision DNA repair (NER) machinery in living cells with computational modeling. We found that individual NER components exchange within tens of seconds between the bound state in repair complexes and the diffusive state in the nucleoplasm, whereas their net accumulation at repair sites evolves over several hours. Based on these in vivo data, we developed a predictive kinetic model for the assembly and function of repair complexes. DNA repair is orchestrated by the interplay of reversible protein-binding events and progressive enzymatic modifications of the chromatin substrate. We demonstrate that faithful recognition of DNA lesions is time consuming, whereas subsequently, repair complexes form rapidly through random and reversible assembly of NER proteins. Our kinetic analysis of the NER system reveals a fundamental conflict between specificity and efficiency of chromatin-associated protein machineries and shows how a trade off is negotiated through reversibility of protein binding.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1083/jcb.200909175

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most reports agree that NER gap refilling is extremely rapid and tightly coordinated with incision.

    “but most reports seem to agree that the refilling is extremely rapid and tightly coordinated with the incision process [49,50]”

    From Mind the gap: keeping UV lesions in check (2011) · cites this paper as [50]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 87 · Cited by 121

Authors
Luijsterburg, M. S., von Bornstaedt, G., Gourdin, A. M., Politi, A. Z., Moné, M. J., Warmerdam, D. O., Goedhart, J., Vermeulen, W., van Driel, R., & Höfer, T.
Affiliations
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • Research Group Modeling of Biological Systems, German Cancer Research Center, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany 2
  • Erasmus MC (NL)
  • Max Delbrück Center (DE)
  • Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, University of Amsterdam, 1098 SM Amsterdam, Netherlands 1
  • German Cancer Research Center (DE)
Corresponding author
Höfer, Thomas
Venue
Journal of Cell Biology
Published
2010-05-03
Volume
189
Issue
3
Pages
445-463
ISSN
  • 0021-9525 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-8140
OpenAlex
W2169506226
Cited by
121
References
87
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 14
FWCI
6.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Cell Biology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • MDC Repository (Max-Delbrueck-Center for Molecular Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Diffusion and Search Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Keywords
nucleotide excision repair, multiprotein complex assembly, DNA damage recognition, chromatin modification
MeSH terms
Animals, Cells, Cultured, Cricetulus, DNA, DNA Damage, DNA Repair, DNA-Binding Proteins, Cricetinae, Humans, Kinetics, CHO Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review