The DOI matches its Crossref record.
STUDIES ON CILIA
Open accessAbstract
Termination of peripheral filaments of the axoneme of gill cilia of fresh-water mussels (Elliptio or Anodonta) occurs in characteristic fashion: (a) subfiber b of certain doublets ends leaving a single simplified tubular unit; (b) the wall of the unit becomes thick and may even obliterate the interior; and (c) the filament drops out of the 9 + 2 pattern. The order in which doublets begin simplifying is also characteristic. This may be determined by numbering the filaments, those with the bridge being 5–6, with the direction of numbering determined by the apparent enantiomorphic configuration (I to IV) of the cross-section. Shorter filaments can be identified in simplifying tips with mixed double and single peripheral units. In this material, laterofrontal cirri show a morphological specialization in the region where individual cilia simplify. The cilia studied run frontally from the body of the cirrus and point in the direction of effective stroke. The longest filaments (Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7) appear as the doublets at the bottom of the cross-section, nearest the surface of the cell of origin. Above them, and above the central pair, a dark band (a section of a dense rod) runs through the matrix. The remaining filaments are the single units. Effective-pointing frontal and lateral ciliary tips end in a fashion similar to laterofrontal tips, although no dense band is present. For all effective-pointing tips studied, the order in which the peripheral filaments end appears to be Nos. (9, 1), 8, 2, 7, 6, 3, 4, 5. However, recovery-pointing lateral tips show a different order: Nos. 7, 6, 8, 5, 9, 4, 1 (3, 2), although the longer filaments are still at the bottom of the cross-section. In simple models of ciliary movement involving contraction of the peripheral filaments, filaments at the top of the cross-section should be longer, if any are. Such models are not supported by the evidence here. These results can be interpreted as supporting sliding-filament models of movement where no length change of peripheral filaments occurs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Satir, P. (1968) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.39.1.77 · Cited by 555
Self-citationChebli, J., Rahmati, M., Lashley, T., Edeman, B., Oldfors, A., Zetterberg, H., & Abramsson, A. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-98487-7 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Satir, P.
- Venue
- The Journal of Cell Biology
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 1965-09-01
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 805-834
- ISSN
- 0021-9525 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-8140
- OpenAlex
- W2008383218
- Cited by
- 229
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: STUDIES ON CILIA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1083/jcb.26.3.805
- The paper
- Satir, P. (1965). STUDIES ON CILIA. The Journal of Cell Biology. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.26.3.805
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.