The DOI matches its Crossref record.
WOUND HEALING AND COLLAGEN FORMATION
Open accessAbstract
The uptake, intracellular transport, and secretion of protein by guinea pig wound fibroblasts was studied by electron microscope radioautography using L-proline-3,4-H3 as a tracer. Experiments were performed to determine the curve of concentration of free amino acid in the blood after intraperitoneal administration of the labeled proline. Radioautographs were quantitatively analyzed and the concentration of isotope, in grains per unit area, was determined for the following cellular and extracellular compartments: ergastoplasm, Golgi complex, peripheral cytoplasmic structures, and collagen. The concentration of label, expressed as number of grains per unit area of each subcellular system, reveals the period during which each cellular compartment is maximally labeled, and presents a clearer picture of the passage of the label through each of these compartments. The data demonstrate appearance of the label at maximum concentration in the ergastoplasm 15 minutes after injection, and this compartment remains maximally labeled for 2 hours. In the Golgi complex, concentration is not maximal until 60 minutes after injection of isotope, and appears to decrease before or at about the same rate as that of the ergastoplasm. The present experiment is consistent with previous light microscope radioautographic studies, and no storage phase was found in the fibroblasts. The findings are not simply consistent with a direct precursor-product relationship between the contents of the ergastoplasm and those of the Golgi complex. Morphologic observations of regions in the fibroblast interpretable as possible sites of communication between the ergastoplasm and the extracellular space, together with the kinetic studies, permit the suggestion of an alternate pathway of passage of at least some of the synthesized protein directly from the ergastoplasmic cisternae to the cell exterior.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Preparation and Use of Liposomes as Models of Biological Membranes
Bangham, A. D., Hill, M. W., & Miller, N. G. A. (1974) · Methods in Membrane Biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-7422-4_1 · Cited by 585
Weinstock, M., & Leblond, C. P. (1974) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.60.1.92 · Cited by 377
Chevalier, G., & Collet, A. J. (1972) · The Anatomical Record · doi:10.1002/ar.1091740303 · Cited by 301
Wisse, E. (1972) · Journal of Ultrastructure Research · doi:10.1016/0022-5320(72)90089-5 · Cited by 300
The differentiation of the dermis in the laboratory mouse
Van Exan, R. J., & Hardy, M. H. (1984) · American Journal of Anatomy · doi:10.1002/aja.1001690204 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Ross, R., & Benditt, E. P.
- Venue
- The Journal of Cell Biology
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 1965-10-01
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 83-106
- ISSN
- 0021-9525 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-8140
- OpenAlex
- W2116583550
- Cited by
- 297
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 96.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: WOUND HEALING AND COLLAGEN FORMATION. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1083/jcb.27.1.83
- The paper
- Ross, R., & Benditt, E. P. (1965). WOUND HEALING AND COLLAGEN FORMATION. The Journal of Cell Biology. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.27.1.83
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.