The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Thin Sections
Open accessAbstract
Knowledge of the thickness of sections is important for proper interpretation of electron micrographs. Therefore, the thicknesses of sections of n-butyl methacrylate polymer were determined by ellipsometry, and correlated with the color shown in reflected light. The results are: gray, thinner than 60 mµ; silver, 60 to 90 mµ; gold, 90 to 150 mµ; purple, 150 to 190 mµ; blue, 190 to 240 mµ; green, 240 to 280 mµ; and yellow, 280 to 320 mµ. These results agree well with optical theory and with previous published data for thin films. Sections, after cutting, are 30 to 40 per cent shorter than the face of the block from which they were cut. Only a small improvement results from allowing the sections to remain in the collecting trough at room temperature. Heating above room temperature, however, reduces this shortening, with a corresponding improvement in dimensions and spatial relationships in the sections. When the thickness of the section is considered in interpreting electron micrographs instead of considering the section to be two-dimensional, a more accurate interpretation is possible. The consideration of electron micrographs as arising from projections of many profiles from throughout the whole thickness of the section explains the apparent lack of continuity often observed in serial sections. It is believed that serial sections are actually continuous, but that the change in size of structure through the thickness of one section and the consideration of only the largest profile shown in the micrograph can account for the lack of continuity previously observed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Whole-animal connectomes of both Caenorhabditis elegans sexes
Cook, S. J., Jarrell, T. A., Brittin, C. A., Wang, Y., Bloniarz, A. E., Yakovlev, M. A., Nguyen, K. C. Q., Tang, L. T.-H., Bayer, E. A., Duerr, J. S., et al. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1352-7 · Cited by 921
Satir, P. (1968) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.39.1.77 · Cited by 555
The Connectome of a Decision-Making Neural Network
Jarrell, T. A., Wang, Y., Bloniarz, A. E., Brittin, C. A., Xu, M., Thomson, J. N., Albertson, D. G., Hall, D. H., & Emmons, S. W. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1221762 · Cited by 474
The development of synapses in the visual system of the cat
Cragg, B. G. (1975) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.901600202 · Cited by 520
A multi-scale brain map derived from whole-brain volumetric reconstructions
Brittin, C. A., Cook, S. J., Hall, D. H., Emmons, S. W., & Cohen, N. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03284-x · Cited by 116
Metadata
- Authors
- Peachey, L. D.
- Venue
- The Journal of Cell Biology
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 1958-05-25
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 233-242
- ISSN
- 0021-9525 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-8140
- OpenAlex
- W2135384473
- Cited by
- 335
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Thin Sections. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1083/jcb.4.3.233
- The paper
- Peachey, L. D. (1958). Thin Sections. The Journal of Cell Biology. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.4.3.233
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.