The DOI matches its Crossref record.
CHLAMYDOMONAS FLAGELLA
Open accessAbstract
Methods were developed for the isolation of Chlamydomonas flagella and for their fractionation into membrane, mastigoneme, "matrix," and axoneme components. Each component was studied by electron microscopy and acrylamide gel electrophoresis. Purified membranes retained their tripartite ultrastructure and were shown to contain one high molecular weight protein band on electrophoresis in sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-urea gels. Isolated mastigonemes (hairlike structures which extend laterally from the flagellar membrane in situ) were of uniform size and were constructed of ellipsoidal subunits joined end to end. Electrophoretic analysis of mastigonemes indicated that they contained a single glycoprotein of ∼ 170,000 daltons The matrix fraction contained a number of proteins (particularly those of the amorphous material surrounding the microtubules), which became solubilized during membrane removal. Isolated axonemes retained the intact "9 + 2" microtubular structure and could be subfractionated by treatment with heat or detergent. Increasing concentrations of detergent solubilized axonemal microtubules in the following order: one of the two central tubules; the remaining central tubule and the outer wall of the B tubule; the remaining portions of the B tubule; the outer wall of the A tubule; the remainder of the A tubule with the exception of a ribbon of three protofilaments. These three protofilaments appeared to be the "partition" between the lumen of the A and B tubule. Electrophoretic analysis of isolated outer doublets of 9 + 2 flagella of wild-type cells and of "9 + 0" flagella of paralyzed mutants indicated that the outer doublets and central tubules were composed of two microtubule proteins (tubulins 1 and 2) Tubulins 1 and 2 were shown to have apparent molecular weights of 56,000 and 53,000 respectively
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A motility in the eukaryotic flagellum unrelated to flagellar beating.
Kozminski, K. G., Johnson, K. A., Forscher, P., & Rosenbaum, J. L. (1993) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.90.12.5519 · Cited by 1,007
Self-citationThe tubulin code and its role in controlling microtubule properties and functions
Janke, C., & Magiera, M. M. (2020) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-020-0214-3 · Cited by 956
Cole, D. G., Diener, D. R., Himelblau, A. L., Beech, P. L., Fuster, J. C., & Rosenbaum, J. L. (1998) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.141.4.993 · Cited by 898
Self-citationLi, J. B., Gerdes, J. M., Haycraft, C. J., Fan, Y., Teslovich, T. M., May-Simera, H., Li, H., Blacque, O. E., Li, L., Leitch, C. C., et al. (2004) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(04)00450-7 · Cited by 760
Kozminski, K. G., Beech, P. L., & Rosenbaum, J. L. (1995) · The Journal of cell biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.131.6.1517 · Cited by 586
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Witman, G. B., Carlson, K., Berliner, J., & Rosenbaum, J. L.
- Venue
- The Journal of Cell Biology
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 1972-09-01
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 507-539
- ISSN
- 0021-9525 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-8140
- OpenAlex
- W2139175710
- Cited by
- 511
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CHLAMYDOMONAS FLAGELLA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1083/jcb.54.3.507
- The paper
- Witman, G. B., Carlson, K., Berliner, J., & Rosenbaum, J. L. (1972). CHLAMYDOMONAS FLAGELLA. The Journal of Cell Biology. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.54.3.507
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.