Cited by 224Retinal Development and DisordersCircadian rhythm and melatoninCellular transport and secretion

Turnover of rod photoreceptor outer segments. II. Membrane addition and loss in relationship to light

Open access
Besharse, J C, Hollyfield, J G, Rayborn, M E·1977·The Journal of Cell Biology

Abstract

The rate of disk addition to rod outer segments (ROS) varies widely in Xenopus laevis tadpoles kept in cyclic light (12L:12D). When measured as radioactive band (3H-band) displacement during the 2nd day after injection of [3H]leucine, 75% of the daily increment of displacement occurred during the first 8 h of light. During the same interval, the number of open disks at the ROS base increased more than threefold. During the last 8 h of darkness, 3H-band displacement was undetectable and the number of open disks was reduced. These observations suggest the possibility that disk addition may occur discontinuously. During the 3rd and 4th days after injection of [3H]leucine, maximal displacement of the 3H-band occurred later in the day than on the 2nd day, its movement no longer corresponding to the increase in open disks. This delay in 3H-band displacement may reflect a time delay as a result of propagation of compressive stress in an elastic ROS system. Maximal disk loss from ROS as reflected in counts of phagosomes in the pigment epithelium occurred within 1 h of light exposure, and phagosome counts remained high for 4 h before declining to a low level in darkness. Modified lighting regimes affected the daily rhythms of shedding and disk addition differently, suggesting that control mechanisms for the two processes are not directly coupled. During 3 days in darkness, disk addition was reduced 50% compared to controls (12L:12D), whereas shedding was reduced by about 40%. Although reduced in level, shedding occurred as a free-running circadian rhythm. There was no evidence of rhythmicity of disk addition in darkness. In constant light, the rate of disk addition was not different from controls, but shedding was reduced by about 80% after the 1st day. This resulted in a 21% increase in ROS length. Among animals kept on a 2.5L:21.5D cycle, the rate of disk addition was reduced by 40% while shedding was maintained near control levels, resulting in a slight decrease in ROS length. These observations indicate that normal shedding requires alternating light and darkness, and that the daily rhythm of disk addition is due primarily to daily stimulation by light.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1083/jcb.75.2.507

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most animals (including mouse, rat, cat, hamster, Xenopus laevis, goldfish, rabbit, and chick) appear to be entrained to a circadian rhythm, which is cued by the light/dark cycle and persists even when the animal is maintained in absolute darkness, but not in absolute light.

    “Most animals (including mouse, rat, cat, hamster, Xenopus laevis, goldfish, rabbit, and chick) appear to be entrained to a circadian rhythm, which is cued by the light/dark cycle and persists even when the animal is maintained in absolute darkness (LaVail, 1976; Besharse et al., 1977; Grace et al., 1996), but not in absolute light (Teirstein et al., 1980).”

    From The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium (2020) · cites this paper as Besharse et al., 1977

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 32 · Cited by 224

Authors
Besharse, J. C., Hollyfield, J. G., & Rayborn, M. E.
Affiliations
Columbia University (US)
Venue
The Journal of Cell Biology
Published
1977-11-01
Volume
75
Issue
2
Pages
507-527
ISSN
  • 0021-9525 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-8140
OpenAlex
W2075844449
Cited by
224
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
FWCI
7.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • The Journal of Cell Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
Keywords
circadian rhythm, light-dark cycle, Xenopus laevis tadpoles, phagosome, retinal pigment epithelium, membrane turnover, compressive stress, outer segment length, constant light
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Membrane, Light, Microscopy, Electron, Phagosomes, Photoreceptor Cells, Rod Cell Outer Segment, Xenopus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review