The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Retention of differentiated properties in an established dog kidney epithelial cell line (MDCK).
Open accessAbstract
Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells grown in tissue culture have the morphological properties of distal tubular epithelial cells, form tight junctions, and lack several proximal tubular enzyme markers. Adenylate cyclase in these cells was stimulated by vasopressin, oxytocin, prostaglandins E1 and E2, glucagon, and cholera toxin. Hormone-stimulated adenylate cyclase activity in isolated membrane preparations was dependent on low concentrations of GTP and had the MgCl2 and pH optima expected for the kidney enzyme. The results, as well as the demonstration of enhanced hemicyst formation induced by cyclic AMP, suggest that the MDCK cell line has retained the differentiated properties of the kidney epithelial cell of origin. When MDCK cells were injected into baby nude mice, continuous nodule growth was observed until adulthood was attained. Histological studies revealed the presence of two cell types: normal mouse fibroblasts which comprise 80--90% of the solid nodule mass, and MDCK cells, which formed epithelial sheets lining internal fluid-filled glands. Electron microscope analysis showed that the mucosal surfaces of the cells were characterized by microvilli which faced the lumen of the glands, that adjacent MDCK cells were joined by tight junctions, and that the serosal surfaces of the epithelial sheets were characterized by smooth plasma membranes which were lined by a continuous basement membrane. These observations lead to the conclusion that the MDCK cells retain regional differentiation of their plasma membranes and the ability to regenerate kidney tubule-like structures in vivo.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Identification of two strains of MDCK cells which resemble separate nephron tubule segments
Richardson, J. C. W., Scalera, V., & Simmons, N. L. (1981) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects · doi:10.1016/0304-4165(81)90307-x · Cited by 286
Hall, H. G., Farson, D. A., & Bissell, M. J. (1982) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.79.15.4672 · Cited by 281
Kanlaya, R., Khamchun, S., Kapincharanon, C., & Thongboonkerd, V. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep30233 · Cited by 110
Metadata
- Authors
- Rindler, M. J., Chuman, L. M., Shaffer, L., & Saier, M. H.
- Venue
- The Journal of cell biology
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 1979-06-01
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 635-648
- ISSN
- 0021-9525 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-8140
- OpenAlex
- W2160061090
- Cited by
- 312
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Retention of differentiated properties in an established dog kidney epithelial cell line (MDCK). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1083/jcb.81.3.635
- The paper
- Rindler, M. J., Chuman, L. M., Shaffer, L., & Saier, M. H. (1979). Retention of differentiated properties in an established dog kidney epithelial cell line (MDCK). The Journal of cell biology. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.81.3.635
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.