Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 508

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Microtrabecular lattice of the cytoplasmic ground substance. Artifact or reality.

Open access
Wolosewick, J J, Porter, K R·1979·The Journal of cell biology

Abstract

The cytoplasmic ground substance of cultured cells prepared for high voltage transmission electron microscopy (glutaraldehyde/osmium fixed, alcohol or acetone dehydrated, critical-point dried) consists of slender (3-6 nm Diam) strands--the microtrabeculae (55)--that form an irregular three-dimensional lattice (the microtrabecular lattice). The microtrabeculae interconnect the membranous and nonmembranous organelles and are confluent with the cortices of the cytoplast. The lattice is found in all portions of the cytoplast of all cultured cells examined. The possibility that the lattice structure is an artifact of specimen preparation has been tested by (a) subjecting whole cultured cells (WI-38, NRK, chick embryo fibroblasts) to various chemical (aldehydes, osmium tetroxide) and nonchemical (freezing) fixation schedules, (b) examination of model systems (erythrocytes, protein solutions), (c) substantiating the relaibility of critical-point drying, and (d) comparing images of whole cells with conventionally prepared (plastic-embedded) cells. The lattice structure is preserved by chemical and nonchemical fixation, though alterations in ultrastructure can occur especially after prolonged exposure to osmium tetroxide. The critical-point method for drying specimens appears to be reliable as is the freeze-drying method. The discrepancies between images of plastic-embedded and sectioned cells, and images of whole, critical-point dried cells appear to be related, in part, to the electron-scattering properties of the embedding resin. The described observations indicate that the microtrabecular lattice seen in electron micrographs closely represents the nonrandom structure of the cytoplasmic ground substance of living cultured cells.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1083/jcb.82.1.114

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 508

Metadata

Authors
Wolosewick, J. J., & Porter, K. R.
Venue
The Journal of cell biology
Published
1979-07-01
Volume
82
Issue
1
Pages
114-139
ISSN
  • 0021-9525 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-8140
OpenAlex
W2141539220
Cited by
508
References
1
FWCI
45.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Microtrabecular lattice of the cytoplasmic ground substance. Artifact or reality. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1083/jcb.82.1.114
The paper
Wolosewick, J. J., & Porter, K. R. (1979). Microtrabecular lattice of the cytoplasmic ground substance. Artifact or reality. The Journal of cell biology. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.82.1.114

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.