The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Use of colloidal gold particles in double-labeling immunoelectron microscopy of ultrathin frozen tissue sections.
Open accessAbstract
Complexes of protein-A with 5 and 16 nm colloidal gold particles (PA/Au5 and PA/Au16) are presented as sensitive and clean immunoprobes for ultrathin frozen sections of slightly fixed tissue. The probes are suitable for indirect labeling and offer the opportunity to mark multiple sites. The best procedure for double labeling was to use the smaller probe first, i.e., antibody 1 - PA/Au5 - antibody 2 - PA/Au16. When this was done, no significant interference between PA/Au5 and PA/Au16 occurred. Using this double-labeling procedure we made an accurate comparison between the subcellular distributions of amylase as a typical secretory protein and of GP-2 a glycoprotein, characteristic for zymogen granule membrane (ZGM) preparations. We prepared two rabbit antibodies against GP-2. One antibody (R x ZGM) was obtained by immunizing with native membrane material. The specificity of R x ZGM was achieved by adsorption with the zymogen granule content subfraction. The other, R x GP-2, was raised against the GP-2 band of the SDS polyacrylamide profile of ZGM. We found that the carbohydrate moiety of GP-2 was involved in the antigenic determinant for R x ZGM, while R x GP-2 was most likely directed against GP-2 polypeptide backbone. THe immunocytochemical observations showed that GP-2, on the one hand, exhibited the characteristics of a membrane protein by its occurrence in the cell membrane, the Golgi membranes, and its association with the membranes of the zymogen granules. On the other hand, GP-2 was present in the contents of the zymogen granules and in the acinar and ductal lumina. Also, a GP-2-like glycoprotein was found in the cannulated pancreatic secretion (Scheffer et al., 1980, Eur. J. Cell Biol. 23:122-128). Hence, GP-2 should be considered as a membrane-associated secretory protein of the rat pancreas.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Escola, J.-M., Kleijmeer, M. J., Stoorvogel, W., Griffith, J. M., Yoshie, O., & Geuze, H. J. (1998) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.273.32.20121 · Cited by 1,228
Self-citationWischik, C. M., Novak, M., Thøgersen, H. C., Edwards, P. C., Runswick, M. J., Jakes, R., Walker, J. E., Milstein, C., Roth, M., & Klug, A. (1988) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.85.12.4506 · Cited by 939
Cooperation of GGAs and AP-1 in Packaging MPRs at the Trans-Golgi Network
Doray, B., Ghosh, P., Griffith, J., Geuze, H. J., & Kornfeld, S. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1075327 · Cited by 312
Self-citationLakkakorpi, P. T., Horton, M. A., Helfrich, M. H., Karhukorpi, E. K., & Väänänen, H. K. (1991) · The Journal of cell biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.115.4.1179 · Cited by 168
Mammalian GGAs act together to sort mannose 6-phosphate receptors
Ghosh, P., Griffith, J., Geuze, H. J., & Kornfeld, S. (2003) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.200308038 · Cited by 90
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Geuze, H. J., Slot, J. W., van der Ley, P. A., & Scheffer, R. C.
- Venue
- The Journal of cell biology
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 1981-06-01
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 653-665
- ISSN
- 0021-9525 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-8140
- OpenAlex
- W2053840076
- Cited by
- 382
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Use of colloidal gold particles in double-labeling immunoelectron microscopy of ultrathin frozen tissue sections. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1083/jcb.89.3.653
- The paper
- Geuze, H. J., Slot, J. W., van der Ley, P. A., & Scheffer, R. C. (1981). Use of colloidal gold particles in double-labeling immunoelectron microscopy of ultrathin frozen tissue sections. The Journal of cell biology. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.89.3.653
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.