The DOI matches its Crossref record.
THE UPTAKE, STORAGE, AND INTRACELLULAR HYDROLYSIS OF CARBOHYDRATES BY MACROPHAGES
Open accessAbstract
The exposure of cultivated mouse macrophages to sucrose (0.009–0.03 M) leads to the formation of large phase- and electron-lucent, acid phosphatase-positive vacuoles in the perinuclear region. The vacuolization process and the uptake of sucrose-14C is blocked by inhibitors of pinocytosis and stimulated by calf serum in the medium. These results suggest the uptake of sucrose by pinocytosis and its subsequent segregation and storage in secondary lysosomes. The addition of sucrose also increases the total content of three macrophage lysosomal hydrolases. The addition of invertase to the environment of sucrose-laden macrophages leads to the prompt shrinkage of the sucrose-containing lysosomes. This is accompanied by the intracellular hydrolysis of sucrose to fructose and glucose residues which are promptly excreted into the medium. The uptake of invertase, as indicated by the shrinkage of sucrose-containing vacuoles, is blocked by inhibitors of pinocytosis. No effect was noted when invertase was added to macrophages laden with Ficoll, a polysucrose which is not hydrolyzed by the enzyme. The influence of other carbohydrates was then investigated. Monosaccharides with molecular weights up to 220 did not produce vacuolization. However, a certain number of di-, tri-, and tetrasaccharides produced vacuolization identical with that of sucrose. Each of the disaccharides which produced vacuolization was resistant to the complement of macrophage hexosidases, whereas those that were ineffective were degraded by either macrophage or serum enzymes. The addition of ß-glucosidase to cellobiose-laden macrophages resulted in the shrinkage of vacuoles but did not alter the vacuoles of sucrose containing cells. The ability of small, neutral carbohydrates to produce lysosomal swelling is dependent upon both molecular weight and their resistance to lysosomal hydrolases.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
De Duve, C., De Barsy, T., Poole, B., Trouet, A., Tulkens, P., & Van Hoof, F. (1974) · Biochemical Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/0006-2952(74)90174-9 · Cited by 1,901
Endocytosis and the recycling of plasma membrane.
Steinman, R. M., Mellman, I. S., Muller, W. A., & Cohn, Z. A. (1983) · The Journal of cell biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.96.1.1 · Cited by 1,450
Self-citationArmstrong, J. A., & Hart, P. D. (1971) · The Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.134.3.713 · Cited by 990
Membrane flow during pinocytosis. A stereologic analysis.
Steinman, R. M., Brodie, S. E., & Cohn, Z. A. (1976) · The Journal of cell biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.68.3.665 · Cited by 641
Self-citationInaba, K., Inaba, M., Naito, M., & Steinman, R. M. (1993) · The Journal of experimental medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.178.2.479 · Cited by 473
Metadata
- Authors
- Cohn, Z. A., & Ehrenreich, B. A.
- Venue
- The Journal of Experimental Medicine
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 1969-01-01
- Volume
- 129
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 201-225
- ISSN
- 0022-1007 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-9538
- OpenAlex
- W2041894836
- Cited by
- 192
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE UPTAKE, STORAGE, AND INTRACELLULAR HYDROLYSIS OF CARBOHYDRATES BY MACROPHAGES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1084/jem.129.1.201
- The paper
- Cohn, Z. A., & Ehrenreich, B. A. (1969). THE UPTAKE, STORAGE, AND INTRACELLULAR HYDROLYSIS OF CARBOHYDRATES BY MACROPHAGES. The Journal of Experimental Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.129.1.201
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.