The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Control of mating preferences in mice by genes in the major histocompatibility complex.
Open accessAbstract
When a male mouse is presented with two H-2 congenic two female in estrus, his choice of a mate is influenced by their H-2 types. The term "strain preference" is used to describe the general tendency of the male population of one inbred strain to prefer two female of one H-2 type rather than another. The term "consistency of choice" is used to describe the added tendency of particular two males of one inbred strain, in sequential mating trials, to prefer two females of the H-2 type they chose in previous trials. Statistical analysis showed trends in the data that support the following conclusions: (a) The choice is made by the male, not the female. (b) The strain preference of two males may favor two females of dissimilar H-2 type (four of six comparisons), or of similar H-2 type (one of six comparisons). (c) Consistency of choice does not always correspond with strain preference. In one of six comparisons of H-2 genotypes there was no strain preference but pronounced consistency of choice by individual two male.This suggests memory, but fortuitous bias is not excluded. (d) Strain preference of the same male population may favor two male of the same or a different H-2 type, depending on which different H-2 type is offered as the choice alternative to self.These findings conform to a provisional model in which olfactory mating preference is governed by two linked genes in the region of H-2, one for the female signal and one for the male receptor. These mating preferences could in natural populations serve the purpose of increasing the representation of particular H-2 haplotypes or of maintaining heterozygosity of genes in the region of H-2.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Scent of Genetic Compatibility: Sexual Selection and the Major Histocompatibility Complex
Penn, D. J. (2002) · Ethology · doi:10.1046/j.1439-0310.2002.00768.x · Cited by 503
Wedekind, C., & Füri, S. (1997) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.1997.0204 · Cited by 494
Jiang, Y., Bolnick, D. I., & Kirkpatrick, M. (2013) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/670160 · Cited by 427
Scent-marking by male mammals: Cheat-proof signals to competitors and mates
Gosling, L. M., & Roberts, S. C. (2001) · Advances in the Study of Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0065-3454(01)80007-3 · Cited by 411
Mate choice decisions of stickleback females predictably modified by MHC peptide ligands
Milinski, M., Griffiths, S., Wegner, K. M., Reusch, T. B. H., Haas-Assenbaum, A., & Boehm, T. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0408264102 · Cited by 396
Metadata
- Authors
- Yamazaki, K., Boyse, E. A., Miké, V, Thaler, H. T., Mathieson, B. J., Abbott, J., Boyse, J., Zayas, Z. A., & Thomas, L.
- Venue
- The Journal of experimental medicine
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 1976-11-01
- Volume
- 144
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1324-1335
- ISSN
- 0022-1007 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-9538
- OpenAlex
- W2163115265
- Cited by
- 687
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Control of mating preferences in mice by genes in the major histocompatibility complex. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1084/jem.144.5.1324
- The paper
- Yamazaki, K., Boyse, E. A., Miké, V, Thaler, H. T., Mathieson, B. J., Abbott, J., Boyse, J., Zayas, Z. A., & Thomas, L. (1976). Control of mating preferences in mice by genes in the major histocompatibility complex. The Journal of experimental medicine. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.144.5.1324
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.