The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Heterogeneity in surface antigen and glycoprotein expression of cell lines derived from different melanoma metastases of the same patient. Implications for the study of tumor antigens.
Open accessAbstract
Three established lines of melanoma cells were derived from anatomically distinct metastases occurring in a single patient (DX). The lines, DX-1, DX-2, and DX-3, showed marked phenotypic diversity, as indicated by characteristic differences in growth rate, morphology, pigmentation, and the expression of surface antigens and glycoproteins. DX-1 and DX-3 expressed HLA-DR products, whereas DX-2 lacked HLA-DR expression. DX-1, DX-2, and DX-3 could also be distinguished on the basis of the profile of radiolabeled glycoproteins. Additional quantitative differences in the surface antigenic phenotype of the three cell lines were revealed by serological tests with a battery of monoclonal and conventional antibodies defining melanoma differentiation antigens. In tests for autologous humoral immunity to melanoma cells, sera from patient DX were found to have IgG antibody that reacted with surface antigens of DX-2 cells; no autologous reactivity was seen with DX-1 or DX-3 target cells or with three more recently established melanoma cell lines from patient DX. Absorption analysis indicated that the antigen detected by DX sera on DX-2 cells is a class 1 melanoma antigen, having been detected only on DX-2 cells and in much lower but demonstrable amounts on DX-1 and DX-3 cells. No other cell type, including DX normal fibroblasts, DX B cells, or 45 allogeneic melanoma cell lines expressed the class 1 antigen of DX melanoma. The fact that only one of the melanoma cell lines derived from patient DX was suitable target for the detection of autologous class 1 reactivity has implications for the study of human tumor antigens and may explain why antibody to class 1 antigens has been found so infrequently in past studies of melanoma patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Biological Diversity in Metastatic Neoplasms: Origins and Implications
Fidler, I. J., & Hart, I. R. (1982) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7112116 · Cited by 928
Clinical lessons learned from the first leg of the CAR T cell journey
Majzner, R. G., & Mackall, C. L. (2019) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-019-0564-6 · Cited by 636
Liang, C., Xu, L., Song, G., & Liu, Z. (2016) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c6cs00458j · Cited by 435
Structural Heterogeneity and Functional Domains of Murine Immunoglobulin G Fc Receptors
Ravetch, J. V., Luster, A. D., Weinshank, R., Kochan, J., Pavlovec, A., Portnoy, D. A., Hulmes, J., Pan, Y.-C. E., & Unkeless, J. C. (1986) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2946078 · Cited by 333
Transforming ras genes from human melanoma: a manifestation of tumour heterogeneity?
Albino, A. P., Strange, R. L., Oliff, A. I., Furth, M. E., & Old, L. J. (1984) · Nature · doi:10.1038/308069a0 · Cited by 324
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Albino, A. P., Lloyd, K. O., Houghton, A. N., Oettgen, H. F., & Old, L. J.
- Venue
- The Journal of experimental medicine
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 1981-12-01
- Volume
- 154
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1764-1778
- ISSN
- 0022-1007 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-9538
- OpenAlex
- W1998239567
- Cited by
- 207
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Heterogeneity in surface antigen and glycoprotein expression of cell lines derived from different melanoma metastases of the same patient. Implications for the study of tumor antigens. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1084/jem.154.6.1764
- The paper
- Albino, A. P., Lloyd, K. O., Houghton, A. N., Oettgen, H. F., & Old, L. J. (1981). Heterogeneity in surface antigen and glycoprotein expression of cell lines derived from different melanoma metastases of the same patient. Implications for the study of tumor antigens. The Journal of experimental medicine. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.154.6.1764
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.