The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Contribution of antigen-presenting cell major histocompatibility complex gene products to the specificity of antigen-induced T cell activation
Open accessAbstract
Previous studies from our laboratory showed that B 10.A mice are high responders to pigeon cytochrome c fragment 81-104, whereas B 10.A(5R) mice are low responders. In the present studies, the C-terminal cyanogen bromide cleavage fragment and homologous synthetic peptides of tobacco horn worm moth cytochrome c were shown to be immunogenic in both B10.A and B10.A(5R) mice. These strains, however, showed different patterns of cross-reactivity when immune lymph node T cells were stimulated with cytochrome c fragments from other species. To examine the two patterns of responsiveness at a clonal level, cytochrome c fragment-specific T cell hybridomas were made and found to secrete interleukin 2 in response to antigen. The patterns of cross- reactivity of these B 10.A and B 10.A(5R) clones were similar to that seen in the whole lymph node population. Surprisingly, when these clones were tested for major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-restricted antigen recognition, they were all found to respond to antigen with both B10.A and B10.A(5R) antigen-presenting cells (APC). Furthermore, the cross-reactivity pattern appeared to be largely determined by the genotype of the APC, not the genotype of the T cell clone. That is, a given T cell clone displayed a different fine specificity when assayed with B10.A or B10.A(5R) APC. This observation indicates that the APC MHC gene product and antigen interact during the stimulation of the T cell response and that as a consequence the specificity of antigen-induced T cell activation is influenced by these MHC gene products. (During the preparation of this manuscript it has come to our attention that results similar to our own, concerning the fine specificity of cytotoxic T cell clones, have been obtained by Dr. T. R. Hunig and Dr. M. J. Bevan, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston, MA. T. R. Hunig and M. J. Bevan. 1981. Specificity of T-cell clones illustrates altered self hypothesis. Nature. 294:460.)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
T-cell antigen receptor genes and T-cell recognition
Davis, M. M., & Bjorkman, P. J. (1988) · Nature · doi:10.1038/334395a0 · Cited by 3,202
Isolation of cDNA clones encoding T cell-specific membrane-associated proteins
Hedrick, S. M., Cohen, D. I., Nielsen, E. A., & Davis, M. M. (1984) · Nature · doi:10.1038/308149a0 · Cited by 1,244
Schwartz, R. (1985) · Annual Review of Immunology · doi:10.1146/annurev.immunol.3.1.237 · Cited by 932
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Heber-Katz, E., Schwartz, R., Matis, L., Hannum, C., Fairwell, T., Appella, E., & Hansburg, D.
- Venue
- The Journal of Experimental Medicine
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 1982-04-01
- Volume
- 155
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1086-1099
- ISSN
- 0022-1007 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-9538
- OpenAlex
- W2070483336
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Contribution of antigen-presenting cell major histocompatibility complex gene products to the specificity of antigen-induced T cell activation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1084/jem.155.4.1086
- The paper
- Heber-Katz, E., Schwartz, R., Matis, L., Hannum, C., Fairwell, T., Appella, E., & Hansburg, D. (1982). Contribution of antigen-presenting cell major histocompatibility complex gene products to the specificity of antigen-induced T cell activation. The Journal of Experimental Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.155.4.1086
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.