The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Differences in antigen presentation to MHC class I-and class II-restricted influenza virus-specific cytolytic T lymphocyte clones.
Open accessAbstract
We have examined requirements for antigen presentation to a panel of MHC class I-and class II-restricted, influenza virus-specific CTL clones by controlling the form of virus presented on the target cell surface. Both H-2K/D- and I region-restricted CTL recognize target cells exposed to infectious virus, but only the I region-restricted clones efficiently lysed histocompatible target cells pulsed with inactivated virus preparations. The isolated influenza hemagglutinin (HA) polypeptide also could sensitize target cells for recognition by class II-restricted, HA-specific CTL, but not by class I-restricted, HA-specific CTL. Inhibition of nascent viral protein synthesis abrogated the ability of target cells to present viral antigen relevant for class I-restricted CTL recognition. Significantly, presentation for class II-restricted recognition was unaffected in target cells exposed to preparations of either inactivated or infectious virus. This differential sensitivity suggested that these H-2I region-restricted CTL recognized viral polypeptides derived from the exogenously introduced virions, rather than viral polypeptides newly synthesized in the infected cell. In support of this contention, treatment of the target cells with the lysosomotropic agent chloroquine abolished recognition of infected target cells by class II-restricted CTL without diminishing class I-restricted recognition of infected target cells. Furthermore, when the influenza HA gene was introduced into target cells without exogenous HA polypeptide, the target cells that expressed the newly synthesized protein product of the HA gene were recognized only by H-2K/D-restricted CTL. These observations suggest that important differences may exist in requirements for antigen presentation between H-2K/D and H-2I region-restricted CTL. These differences may reflect the nature of the antigenic epitopes recognized by these two CTL subsets.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Induction of virus‐specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes in vivo by liposome‐entrapped mRNA
Martinon, F., Krishnan, S., Lenzen, G., Magné, R., Gomard, E., Guillet, J., Lévy, J., & Meulien, P. (1993) · European Journal of Immunology · doi:10.1002/eji.1830230749 · Cited by 473
Spies, T., & DeMars, R. (1991) · Nature · doi:10.1038/351323a0 · Cited by 406
Brefeldin A implicates egress from endoplasmic reticulum in class I restricted antigen presentation
Nuchtern, J. G., Bonifacino, J. S., Biddison, W. E., & Klausner, R. D. (1989) · Nature · doi:10.1038/339223a0 · Cited by 317
Gaczynska, M., Rock, K. L., Spies, T., & Goldberg, A. L. (1994) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.91.20.9213 · Cited by 312
Living with Clathrin: Its Role in Intracellular Membrane Traffic
Brodsky, F. M. (1988) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2904698 · Cited by 301
Metadata
- Authors
- Morrison, L. A., Lukacher, A. E., Braciale, V. L., Fan, D. P., & Braciale, T. J.
- Venue
- The Journal of experimental medicine
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 1986-04-01
- Volume
- 163
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 903-921
- ISSN
- 0022-1007 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-9538
- OpenAlex
- W2105818762
- Cited by
- 507
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Differences in antigen presentation to MHC class I-and class II-restricted influenza virus-specific cytolytic T lymphocyte clones. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1084/jem.163.4.903
- The paper
- Morrison, L. A., Lukacher, A. E., Braciale, V. L., Fan, D. P., & Braciale, T. J. (1986). Differences in antigen presentation to MHC class I-and class II-restricted influenza virus-specific cytolytic T lymphocyte clones. The Journal of experimental medicine. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.163.4.903
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.