The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Neutrophils are essential for early anti-Listeria defense in the liver, but not in the spleen or peritoneal cavity, as revealed by a granulocyte-depleting monoclonal antibody.
Open accessAbstract
This study shows that in mice selectively depleted of neutrophils by treatment with a monoclonal antibody, RB6-8C5, listeriosis is severely exacerbated in the liver, but not in the spleen or peritoneal cavity during the crucial first day of infection. At sites of infection in the livers of neutrophil-depleted mice, Listeria monocytogenes grew to large numbers inside hepatocytes. By contrast, in the livers of normal mice neutrophils rapidly accumulated at infectious foci and this was associated with the lysis of infected hepatocytes that served to abort infection in these permissive cells. In the spleen the situation was different, in that depletion of neutrophils did not result in appreciable exacerbation of infection. In this organ intact infected cells, many of which appeared to be fibroblast-like stromal cells, were found at foci of infection in the presence or absence of large numbers of neutrophils. This suggests that neutrophils are less effective at destroying L. monocytogenes-infected target cells in the spleen than in the liver. Consequently, at least during the first day, the organism remained free to multiply intracellularly in the spleen in cells that are permissive for its growth. Presumably, the same situation exists in the peritoneal cavity, because depleting neutrophils did not severely exacerbate infection initiated at this site.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
CD11b (Mac-1): a marker for CD8+ cytotoxic T cell activation and memory in virus infection
McFarland, H. I., Nahill, S. R., Maciaszek, J. W., & Welsh, R. M. (1992) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.149.4.1326 · Cited by 182
Cited by
Macrophage complement receptors and pathogen clearance
van Lookeren Campagne, M., Wiesmann, C., & Brown, E. J. (2007) · Cellular Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1462-5822.2007.00981.x · Cited by 332
Gut‐liver axis at the frontier of host‐microbial interactions
Brandl, K., Kumar, V., & Eckmann, L. (2017) · American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology · doi:10.1152/ajpgi.00361.2016 · Cited by 201
Nguyen-Jackson, H., Panopoulos, A. D., Zhang, H., Li, H. S., & Watowich, S. S. (2010) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2009-08-240317 · Cited by 151
Popov, A., Abdullah, Z., Wickenhauser, C., Saric, T., Driesen, J., Hanisch, F.-G., Domann, E., Raven, E. L., Dehus, O., Hermann, C., et al. (2006) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci28996 · Cited by 133
Mednick, A. J., Feldmesser, M., Rivera, J., & Casadevall, A. (2003) · European Journal of Immunology · doi:10.1002/eji.200323626 · Cited by 128
Metadata
- Authors
- Conlan, J. W., & North, R. J.
- Venue
- The Journal of experimental medicine
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 1994-01-01
- Volume
- 179
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 259-268
- ISSN
- 0022-1007 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-9538
- OpenAlex
- W2160217307
- Cited by
- 344
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neutrophils are essential for early anti-Listeria defense in the liver, but not in the spleen or peritoneal cavity, as revealed by a granulocyte-depleting monoclonal antibody. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1084/jem.179.1.259
- The paper
- Conlan, J. W., & North, R. J. (1994). Neutrophils are essential for early anti-Listeria defense in the liver, but not in the spleen or peritoneal cavity, as revealed by a granulocyte-depleting monoclonal antibody. The Journal of experimental medicine. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.179.1.259
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.