The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Anti-immunoglobulin E treatment decreases worm burden and egg production in Schistosoma mansoni-infected normal and interferon gamma knockout mice.
Abstract
The immunoglobulin E (IgE) response is generally considered an essential component of the host defense against parasitic helminths such as Schistosoma mansoni. In contrast, work on antischistosome vaccines suggests that interferon gamma (IFN-gamma) is the critical immune mediator for vaccine-induced immunity to the parasite. In this study, the total IgE response to a primary S. mansoni infection was suppressed by anti-IgE treatment in both normal mice and in mice with defective IFN genes (gene knockout [GKO]). Reduction of the IgE response resulted in decreased worm burden and a decrease in the number of eggs produced per worm in both normal and GKO mice. Whereas anti-IgE treatment also resulted in reduced hepatosplenomegaly, granulomas around existing schistosome eggs showed normal cellularity. Serum interleukin 4 levels fell in response to the reduction in serum IgE as well. The data suggest that IgE plays a detrimental, rather than beneficial, role for the host in schistosomiasis. Furthermore, the absence of IFN-gamma was found to be of little consequence to the host-response to adults or eggs in a primary schistosome infection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“And some findings even suggest that, in certain settings, IgE or mast cells may have effects during host responses to parasites (e.g., effects which direclty or indirectly result in increased parasite egg production) that may favor the parasite rather than the host [34–36].”
From Mast cells and IgE in defense against lethality of venoms: Possible “benefit” of allergy (2020) · cites this paper as [35]
In the citing paper
“Moreover, when such “immune serum” was depleted of IgE (either by adding a neutralizing antibody to IgE [35, 101] or by heating to 56° C for 1 hour, which eliminates the ability of IgE to bind to FcεRI and induce passive cutaneous anaphylaxis [102] while the function of other antibody classes, including IgG1, is not affected [103]), the immune serum’s ability to transfer enhanced resistance to”
From Mast cells and IgE in defense against lethality of venoms: Possible “benefit” of allergy (2020) · cites this paper as [35]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Casale, T. B. (2001) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.286.23.2956 · Cited by 377
Mast cells and IgE in defense against venoms: Possible “good side” of allergy?
Galli, S. J., Starkl, P., Marichal, T., & Tsai, M. (2016) · Allergology International · doi:10.1016/j.alit.2015.09.002 · Cited by 73
Mast cells and IgE in defense against lethality of venoms: Possible “benefit” of allergy
Galli, S. J., Metz, M., Starkl, P., Marichal, T., & Tsai, M. (2020) · Allergo Journal International · doi:10.1007/s40629-020-00118-6 · Cited by 57
Metadata
- Authors
- Amiri, P., Haak-Frendscho, M., Robbins, K., McKerrow, J. H., Stewart, T., & Jardieu, P.
- Venue
- The Journal of experimental medicine
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 1994-07-01
- Volume
- 180
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 43-51
- ISSN
- 0022-1007
- 1540-9538
- PMC
- PMC2191578
- Cited by
- 78
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anti-immunoglobulin E treatment decreases worm burden and egg production in Schistosoma mansoni-infected normal and interferon gamma knockout mice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1084/jem.180.1.43
- The paper
- Amiri, P., Haak-Frendscho, M., Robbins, K., McKerrow, J. H., Stewart, T., & Jardieu, P. (1994). Anti-immunoglobulin E treatment decreases worm burden and egg production in Schistosoma mansoni-infected normal and interferon gamma knockout mice. The Journal of experimental medicine. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.180.1.43