The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
T cell genetic background determines default T helper phenotype development in vitro.
Open accessAbstract
A host's ability to resist certain pathogens such as Leishmania major can depend upon the phenotype of T helper (Th) subset that develops. Different murine genetic backgrounds are known to significantly alter the direction of Th subset development, although the cellular basis of this influence is poorly understood. To examine the basis of this effect we used an in vitro alpha/beta-T cell receptor (TCR) transgenic system for analysis of Th phenotype development. To control for TCR usage, we derived the DO11.10 alpha/beta-TCR transgene in several genetic backgrounds. Our findings suggest that the effects of genetic background on Th phenotype development reside within the T cell, and not the antigen-presenting cell compartment. Transgenic T cells from both the B10.D2 and BALB/c backgrounds showed development toward either the Th1 or Th2 phenotype under the strong directing influence of interleukin (IL) 12 and IL4, respectively. However, when T cells were activated in vitro under neutral conditions in which exogenous cytokines were not added, B10.D2-derived T cells acquired a significantly stronger Th1 phenotype than T cells from the BALB/c background, correspondent with in vivo Th responses to Leishmania in these strains. Importantly, these cytokine differences resulted in distinct functional properties, because B10.D2- but not BALB/c-derived T cells could induce macrophage production of nitric oxide, an important antimicrobial factor. Thus, the genetically determined default Th phenotype development observed in vitro may correspond to in vivo Th subset responses for pathogens such as Leishmania which do not initiate strong Th phenotype-directing signals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
IL‐4 directs the development of Th2‐like helper effectors
Swain, S. L., Weinberg, A. D., English, M., & Huston, G. (1990) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.145.11.3796 · Cited by 1,254
Le Gros, G., Ben-Sasson, S. Z., Seder, R., Finkelman, F. D., & Paul, W. E. (1990) · The Journal of experimental medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.172.3.921 · Cited by 954
Cited by
M-1/M-2 Macrophages and the Th1/Th2 Paradigm
Mills, C. D., Kincaid, K., Alt, J. M., Heilman, M. J., & Hill, A. M. (2000) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.164.12.6166 · Cited by 3,287
Shimizu, J., Yamazaki, S., & Sakaguchi, S. (1999) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.163.10.5211 · Cited by 1,491
Molecular Mechanisms RegulatinG Th1 Immune Responses
Szabo, S. J., Sullivan, B. M., Peng, S. L., & Glimcher, L. H. (2003) · Annual Review of Immunology · doi:10.1146/annurev.immunol.21.120601.140942 · Cited by 1,019
Interleukin-12: A Cytokine at the Interface of Inflammation and Immunity
Trinchieri, G. (1998) · Advances in Immunology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2776(08)60387-9 · Cited by 760
Tseng, C.-T., Sbrana, E., Iwata-Yoshikawa, N., Newman, P. C., Garron, T., Atmar, R. L., Peters, C. J., & Couch, R. B. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0035421 · Cited by 561
Metadata
- Authors
- Hsieh, C. S., Macatonia, S. E., O'Garra, A., & Murphy, K. M.
- Venue
- The Journal of experimental medicine
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 1995-02-01
- Volume
- 181
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 713-721
- ISSN
- 0022-1007 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-9538
- OpenAlex
- W2121473086
- Cited by
- 462
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 17.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: T cell genetic background determines default T helper phenotype development in vitro. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1084/jem.181.2.713
- The paper
- Hsieh, C. S., Macatonia, S. E., O'Garra, A., & Murphy, K. M. (1995). T cell genetic background determines default T helper phenotype development in vitro. The Journal of experimental medicine. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.181.2.713
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.