The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Survey of the Humoral Immune Response of Cancer Patients to a Panel of Human Tumor Antigens
Open accessAbstract
Evidence is growing for both humoral and cellular immune recognition of human tumor antigens. Antibodies with specificity for antigens initially recognized by cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs), e.g., MAGE and tyrosinase, have been detected in melanoma patient sera, and CTLs with specificity for NY-ESO-1, a cancer-testis (CT) antigen initially identified by autologous antibody, have recently been identified. To establish a screening system for the humoral response to autoimmunogenic tumor antigens, an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was developed using recombinant NY-ESO-1, MAGE-1, MAGE-3, SSX2, Melan-A, and tyrosinase proteins. A survey of sera from 234 cancer patients showed antibodies to NY-ESO-1 in 19 patients, to MAGE-1 in 3, to MAGE-3 in 2, and to SSX2 in 1 patient. No reactivity to these antigens was found in sera from 70 normal individuals. The frequency of NY-ESO-1 antibody was 9.4% in melanoma patients and 12.5% in ovarian cancer patients. Comparison of tumor NY-ESO-1 phenotype and NY-ESO-1 antibody response in 62 stage IV melanoma patients showed that all patients with NY-ESO-1+ antibody had NY-ESO-1+ tumors, and no patients with NY-ESO-1− tumors had NY-ESO-1 antibody. As the proportion of melanomas expressing NY-ESO-1 is 20–40% and only patients with NY-ESO-1+ tumors have antibody, this would suggest that a high percentage of patients with NY-ESO-1+ tumors develop an antibody response to NY-ESO-1.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Fourcade, J., Sun, Z., Benallaoua, M., Guillaume, P., Luescher, I. F., Sander, C., Kirkwood, J. M., Kuchroo, V., & Zarour, H. M. (2010) · Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.20100637 · Cited by 1,307
Harnessing innate immunity in cancer therapy
Demaria, O., Cornen, S., Daëron, M., Morel, Y., Medzhitov, R., & Vivier, E. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1593-5 · Cited by 957
Cancer/testis antigens: an expanding family of targets for cancer immunotherapy
Scanlan., M. J., Gure., A. O., Jungbluth., A. A., Old., L. J., & Chen., Y. (2002) · Immunological Reviews · doi:10.1034/j.1600-065x.2002.18803.x · Cited by 873
Self-citationGermain, C., Gnjatic, S., Tamzalit, F., Knockaert, S., Remark, R., Goc, J., Lepelley, A., Becht, E., Katsahian, S., Bizouard, G., et al. (2014) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.201309-1611oc · Cited by 833
Jäger, E., Gnjatic, S., Nagata, Y., Stockert, E., Jäger, D., Karbach, J., Neumann, A., Rieckenberg, J., Chen, Y.-T., Ritter, G., et al. (2000) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.220413497 · Cited by 426
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Stockert, E., Jäger, E., Chen, Y.-T., Scanlan, M. J., Gout, I., Karbach, J., Arand, M., Knuth, A., & Old, L. J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Experimental Medicine
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 1998-04-20
- Volume
- 187
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1349-1354
- ISSN
- 0022-1007 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-9538
- OpenAlex
- W2130184077
- Cited by
- 698
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Survey of the Humoral Immune Response of Cancer Patients to a Panel of Human Tumor Antigens. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1084/jem.187.8.1349
- The paper
- Stockert, E., Jäger, E., Chen, Y.-T., Scanlan, M. J., Gout, I., Karbach, J., Arand, M., Knuth, A., & Old, L. J. (1998). A Survey of the Humoral Immune Response of Cancer Patients to a Panel of Human Tumor Antigens. The Journal of Experimental Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.187.8.1349
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.