Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 508

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

CD4 T Cells and Their Role in Antitumor Immune Responses

Open access
Toes, René E.M., Ossendorp, Ferry, Offringa, Rienk, Melief, Cornelis J.M.·1999·The Journal of Experimental Medicine

Abstract

The specificity and power of the cellular arm of the immune system may provide new therapeutic approaches to cancer. With the assumption that T cells might be able to recognize and eliminate cancer cells with the same efficiency as virus-infected cells, investigators have searched many years for ways to trigger or amplify the patient's inadequate immune response to tumors. Much attention has been given to the role of CD8+ CTLs because most tumors are MHC class I positive, but negative for MHC class II. Moreover, CD8+ CTLs are able to lyse tumor cells directly upon recognition of peptide–MHC class I complexes expressed by the tumor, and their ability to eradicate large tumor masses in vivo has been demonstrated. The focus in cancer immunology on CD8+ T cell responses is also exemplified by an increasing list of tumor antigens identified by tumor-reactive CD8+ CTLs. CD4+ Th cells have received far less attention, which is remarkable given the pivotal role of these cells in regulating most antigen-specific immune responses. Until now, only a few Th epitopes derived from human tumor antigens recognized by CD4+ Th cells have been identified (1, 2). Three studies published in this issue describe the identification of melanoma antigens that are recognized by CD4+ T cells in the context of MHC class II molecules (3–5). Charting the Th response against human melanoma as well as other tumors is important for the development of optimal anticancer vaccines and for the design of other T cell–related therapeutic modalities in cancer.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1084/jem.189.5.753

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 36 references

Cited by

See all 508

Metadata

Authors
Toes, R. E. M., Ossendorp, F., Offringa, R., & Melief, C. J. M.
Venue
The Journal of Experimental Medicine
Published
1999-03-01
Volume
189
Issue
5
Pages
753-756
ISSN
  • 0022-1007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-9538
OpenAlex
W2040594411
Cited by
508
References
36
FWCI
14.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CD4 T Cells and Their Role in Antitumor Immune Responses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1084/jem.189.5.753
The paper
Toes, R. E. M., Ossendorp, F., Offringa, R., & Melief, C. J. M. (1999). CD4 T Cells and Their Role in Antitumor Immune Responses. The Journal of Experimental Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.189.5.753

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.