Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 373

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Donor-Derived Ip-10 Initiates Development of Acute Allograft Rejection

Open access
Hancock, Wayne W., Gao, Wei, Csizmadia, Vilmos, Faia, Kerrie L., Shemmeri, Nida, Luster, Andrew D.·2001·The Journal of Experimental Medicine

Abstract

An allograft is often considered an immunologically inert playing field on which host leukocytes assemble and wreak havoc. However, we demonstrate that graft-specific physiologic responses to early injury initiate and promulgate destruction of vascularized grafts. Serial analysis of allografts showed that intragraft expression of the three chemokine ligands for the CXC chemo-kine receptor CXCR3 was induced in the order of interferon (IFN)-γ–inducible protein of 10 kD (IP-10, or CXCL10), IFN-inducible T cell α-chemoattractant (I-TAC; CXCL11), and then monokine induced by IFN-γ (Mig, CXCL9). Initial IP-10 production was localized to endothelial cells, and only IP-10 was induced by isografting. Anti–IP-10 monoclonal antibodies prolonged allograft survival, but surprisingly, IP-10–deficient (IP-10−/−) mice acutely rejected allografts. However, though allografts from IP-10+/+ mice were rejected by day 7, hearts from IP-10−/− mice survived long term. Compared with IP-10+/+ donors, use of IP-10−/− donors reduced intragraft expression of cytokines, chemokines and their receptors, and associated leukocyte infiltration and graft injury. Hence, tissue-specific generation of a single chemokine in response to initial ischemia/reperfusion can initiate progressive graft infiltration and amplification of multiple effector pathways, and targeting of this proximal chemokine can prevent acute rejection. These data emphasize the pivotal role of donor-derived IP-10 in initiating alloresponses, with implications for tissue engineering to decrease immunogenicity, and demonstrate that chemokine redundancy may not be operative in vivo.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1084/jem.193.8.975

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Cited by

See all 373

Metadata

Authors
Hancock, W. W., Gao, W., Csizmadia, V., Faia, K. L., Shemmeri, N., & Luster, A. D.
Venue
The Journal of Experimental Medicine
Published
2001-04-16
Volume
193
Issue
8
Pages
975-980
ISSN
  • 0022-1007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-9538
OpenAlex
W2116493322
Cited by
373
References
22
FWCI
36.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Donor-Derived Ip-10 Initiates Development of Acute Allograft Rejection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1084/jem.193.8.975
The paper
Hancock, W. W., Gao, W., Csizmadia, V., Faia, K. L., Shemmeri, N., & Luster, A. D. (2001). Donor-Derived Ip-10 Initiates Development of Acute Allograft Rejection. The Journal of Experimental Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.193.8.975

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.