The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Draining Lymph Nodes of Corneal Transplant Hosts Exhibit Evidence for Donor Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) Class II–positive Dendritic Cells Derived from MHC Class II–negative Grafts
Open accessAbstract
To examine the widely accepted dogmas that corneal grafts lack passenger leukocytes or cells capable of migrating directly to lymph nodes (LNs), we tracked the migration of corneal graft-derived transgenic green fluorescent protein (GFP; Iab) cells into the draining LNs of allogeneic (Iad) recipients. GFP+ cells were identified in cervical LNs several hours after transplantation, and this traffic was significantly enhanced when grafts were placed in inflamed recipient beds. Draining cells were Iab+, CD45+, and CD11c+, and examination of ungrafted corneas revealed numerous similarly CD45+CD11c+CD3−CD8α− cells that uniformly lacked major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II expression; transmission electron microscopy confirmed the presence of morphologically similar cells. After transplantation, or placement in culture, these CD11c+ cells became class II+ in a time-dependent manner and were capable of allostimulatory function. However, the stimulatory capacity of these cornea-derived dendritic cells (DCs) was suppressed compared with splenic controls. These results demonstrate for the first time that the cornea is endowed with resident DCs that are universally MHC class II− but that are capable of expressing class II antigen after surgery and migrating to draining LNs of allografted hosts. These data refute the tenet that the cornea is immune privileged due to lack of resident lymphoreticular cells or due to antigenic sequestration from systemic immunity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ocular immune privilege: therapeutic opportunities from an experiment of nature
Streilein, J. W. (2003) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri1224 · Cited by 807
Cursiefen, C., Cao, J., Chen, L., Liu, Y., Maruyama, K., Jackson, D., Kruse, F. E., Wiegand, S. J., Dana, M. R., & Streilein, J. W. (2004) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.03-1380 · Cited by 329
Self-citationHos, D., Matthaei, M., Bock, F., Maruyama, K., Notara, M., Clahsen, T., Hou, Y., Le, V. N. H., Salabarria, A.-C., Horstmann, J., et al. (2019) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2019.07.001 · Cited by 303
Corneal response to Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection
Hazlett, L. D. (2004) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2003.10.002 · Cited by 278
Allorecognition by T Lymphocytes and Allograft Rejection
Marino, J., Paster, J., & Benichou, G. (2016) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2016.00582 · Cited by 221
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, Y., Hamrah, P., Zhang, Q., Taylor, A. W., & Dana, M. R.
- Venue
- The Journal of Experimental Medicine
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 2002-01-21
- Volume
- 195
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 259-268
- ISSN
- 0022-1007 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-9538
- OpenAlex
- W2105815961
- Cited by
- 214
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Draining Lymph Nodes of Corneal Transplant Hosts Exhibit Evidence for Donor Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) Class II–positive Dendritic Cells Derived from MHC Class II–negative Grafts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1084/jem.20010838
- The paper
- Liu, Y., Hamrah, P., Zhang, Q., Taylor, A. W., & Dana, M. R. (2002). Draining Lymph Nodes of Corneal Transplant Hosts Exhibit Evidence for Donor Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) Class II–positive Dendritic Cells Derived from MHC Class II–negative Grafts. The Journal of Experimental Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20010838
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.