Cited by 88

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Distinct roles of apolipoprotein components within the trypanosome lytic factor complex revealed in a novel transgenic mouse model

Molina-Portela, Maria Pilar, Samanovic, Marie, Raper, Jayne·2008·The Journal of Experimental Medicine

Abstract

Humans express a unique subset of high-density lipoproteins (HDLs) called trypanosome lytic factors (TLFs) that kill many Trypanosoma parasite species. The proteins apolipoprotein (apo) A-I, apoL-I, and haptoglobin-related protein, which are involved in TLF structure and function, were expressed through the introduction of transgenes in mice to explore their physiological roles in vivo. Transgenic expression of human apolipoprotein L-I alone conferred trypanolytic activity in vivo. Coexpression of human apolipoprotein A-I and haptoglobin-related protein (Hpr) had an effect on the integration of apolipoprotein L-I into HDL, and both proteins were required to increase the specific activity of TLF, which was measurable in vitro. Unexpectedly, truncated apolipoprotein L-I devoid of the serum resistance gene interacting domain, which was previously shown to kill human infective trypanosomes, was not trypanolytic in transgenic mice despite being coexpressed with human apolipoprotein A-I and Hpr and incorporated into HDLs. We conclude that all three human apolipoproteins act cooperatively to achieve maximal killing capacity and that truncated apolipoprotein L-I does not function in transgenic animals.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1084/jem.20071463

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. 2006, Curr. Atheroscler. Rep., 8, 405, 10.1007/s11883-006-0038-4 · DOI
  2. 1995, Science., 268, 284, 10.1126/science.7716520 · DOI
  3. 2003, Nature., 422, 83, 10.1038/nature01461 · DOI
  4. 1999, Infect. Immun., 67, 1910, 10.1128/IAI.67.4.1910-1916.1999 · DOI
  5. 2004, Mol. Biochem. Parasitol., 138, 9, 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2004.07.004 · DOI
  6. 2006, Adv. Parasitol., 61, 167, 10.1016/S0065-308X(05)61005-6 · DOI
  7. 2007, J. Eukaryot. Microbiol., 54, 18, 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2006.00228.x · DOI
  8. 2006, Nat. Med., 12, 580, 10.1038/nm1395 · DOI
  9. 2005, Mol. Biochem. Parasitol., 144, 218, 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2005.08.018 · DOI
  10. 2005, Science., 309, 469, 10.1126/science.1114566 · DOI
  11. 2001, J. Biol. Chem., 276, 30254, 10.1074/jbc.M010198200 · DOI
  12. 2005, J. Biol. Chem., 280, 32578, 10.1074/jbc.M503510200 · DOI
  13. 2007, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 104, 4118, 10.1073/pnas.0609902104 · DOI
  14. 2008, Science., 320, 677, 10.1126/science.1156296 · DOI
  15. 2007, PLoS Pathog., 3, e129, 10.1371/journal.ppat.0030129 · DOI
  16. 2004, J. Gene Med., 6, 584, 10.1002/jgm.541 · DOI
  17. 2002, Methods Enzymol., 346, 92, 10.1016/S0076-6879(02)46050-8 · DOI
  18. 2001, Curr. Opin. Microbiol., 4, 402, 10.1016/S1369-5274(00)00226-5 · DOI
  19. 1994, J. Cell Biol., 126, 155, 10.1083/jcb.126.1.155 · DOI
  20. 1991, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 88, 434, 10.1073/pnas.88.2.434 · DOI
  21. 1997, J. Biol. Chem., 272, 25576, 10.1074/jbc.272.41.25576 · DOI
  22. 1998, J. Biol. Chem., 273, 3884, 10.1074/jbc.273.7.3884 · DOI
  23. 2001, Mol. Biochem. Parasitol., 115, 227, 10.1016/S0166-6851(01)00292-4 · DOI
  24. 2007, J. Biol. Chem., 282, 22249, 10.1074/jbc.R700014200 · DOI
  25. 2005, Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 73, 491, 10.4269/ajtmh.2005.73.491 · DOI
  26. 2006, N. Engl. J. Med., 355, 2752, 10.1056/NEJMoa063265 · DOI
  27. 2002, Mol. Biochem. Parasitol., 119, 291, 10.1016/S0166-6851(01)00420-0 · DOI
  28. 2003, Mol. Biochem. Parasitol., 128, 135, 10.1016/S0166-6851(03)00055-0 · DOI
  29. 1995, Mol. Biochem. Parasitol., 70, 131, 10.1016/0166-6851(95)00019-W · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Molina-Portela, M. P., Samanovic, M., & Raper, J.
Affiliations
Department of Medical Parasitology, New York University Langone Medical Center/School of Medicine, New York, NY 10010
Venue
The Journal of Experimental Medicine
Published
2008-07-07
Volume
205
Issue
8
Pages
1721-1728
ISSN
  • 1540-9538
  • 0022-1007
Cited by
88
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review