Cited by 464T-cell and B-cell ImmunologyDevelopmental Biology and Gene RegulationGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics

Delta-like 4 is the essential, nonredundant ligand for Notch1 during thymic T cell lineage commitment

Open access
Koch, Ute, Fiorini, Emma, Benedito, Rui, Besseyrias, Valerie, Schuster-Gossler, Karin, Pierres, Michel, Manley, Nancy R., Duarte, Antonio +2 more·2008·The Journal of Experimental Medicine

Abstract

Thymic T cell lineage commitment is dependent on Notch1 (N1) receptor–mediated signaling. Although the physiological ligands that interact with N1 expressed on thymic precursors are currently unknown, in vitro culture systems point to Delta-like 1 (DL1) and DL4 as prime candidates. Using DL1- and DL4-lacZ reporter knock-in mice and novel monoclonal antibodies to DL1 and DL4, we show that DL4 is expressed on thymic epithelial cells (TECs), whereas DL1 is not detected. The function of DL4 was further explored in vivo by generating mice in which DL4 could be specifically inactivated in TECs or in hematopoietic progenitors. Although loss of DL4 in hematopoietic progenitors did not perturb thymus development, inactivation of DL4 in TECs led to a complete block in T cell development coupled with the ectopic appearance of immature B cells in the thymus. These immature B cells were phenotypically indistinguishable from those developing in the thymus of conditional N1 mutant mice. Collectively, our results demonstrate that DL4 is the essential and nonredundant N1 ligand responsible for T cell lineage commitment. Moreover, they strongly suggest that N1-expressing thymic progenitors interact with DL4-expressing TECs to suppress B lineage potential and to induce the first steps of intrathymic T cell development.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1084/jem.20080829

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • αβ T cells and γδ T cells arise from a common progenitor known as a double-negative cell (DN; lacking CD4 and CD8 expression) in the thymus.

    “αβ T cells and γδ T cells arise from a common progenitor known as a double-negative cell (DN; lacking CD4 and CD8 expression) in the thymus (11).”

    From Comparing Mouse and Human Tissue-Resident γδ T Cells (2022) · cites this paper as [11]

    The introductory passage (page not provided) identifies the earliest thymic progenitors as double-negative thymocytes because they lack CD4 and CD8. It does not state that αβ and γδ T cells both arise from a common DN progenitor; the Methods mention TCRγδ only as a staining marker. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. [1]Rothenberg, E.V. 2000. Stepwise specification of lymphocyte developmental lineages. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 10: 370–379. 10889068
  2. [2]Godfrey, D.I., and A. Zlotnik. 1993. Control points in early T-cell development. Immunol. Today. 14: 547–553. 7903854
  3. [3]Maillard, I., T. Fang, and W.S. Pear. 2005. Regulation of lymphoid development, differentiation, and function by the Notch pathway. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 23: 945–974. 15771590
  4. [4]Radtke, F., A. Wilson, G. Stark, M. Bauer, J. van Meerwijk, H.R. MacDonald, and M. Aguet. 1999. Deficient T cell fate specification in mice with an induced inactivation of Notch1. Immunity. 10: 547–558. 10367900
  5. [5]Wilson, A., H.R. MacDonald, and F. Radtke. 2001. Notch 1–deficient common lymphoid precursors adopt a B cell fate in the thymus. J. Exp. Med. 194: 1003–1012. 11581321 PMC2193487
  6. [6]Han, H., K. Tanigaki, N. Yamamoto, K. Kuroda, M. Yoshimoto, T. Nakahata, K. Ikuta, and T. Honjo. 2002. Inducible gene knockout of transcription factor recombination signal binding protein-J reveals its essential role in T versus B lineage decision. Int. Immunol. 14: 637–645. 12039915
  7. [7]Wolfer, A., A. Wilson, M. Nemir, H.R. MacDonald, and F. Radtke. 2002. Inactivation of Notch1 impairs VDJbeta rearrangement and allows pre-TCR-independent survival of early alpha beta lineage thymocytes. Immunity. 16: 869–879. 12121668
  8. [8]Hoflinger, S., K. Kesavan, M. Fuxa, C. Hutter, B. Heavey, F. Radtke, and M. Busslinger. 2004. Analysis of Notch1 function by in vitro T cell differentiation of Pax5 mutant lymphoid progenitors. J. Immunol. 173: 3935–3944. 15356142
  9. [9]Felli, M.P., M. Maroder, T.A. Mitsiadis, A.F. Campese, D. Bellavia, A. Vacca, R.S. Mann, L. Frati, U. Lendahl, A. Gulino, and I. Screpanti. 1999. Expression pattern of notch1, 2 and 3 and Jagged1 and 2 in lymphoid and stromal thymus components: distinct ligand-receptor interactions in intrathymic T cell development. Int. Immunol. 11: 1017–1025. 10383933
  10. [10]Schmitt, T.M., and J.C. Zuniga-Pflucker. 2002. Induction of T cell development from hematopoietic progenitor cells by delta-like-1 in vitro. Immunity. 17: 749–756. 12479821
  11. [11]Harman, B.C., E.J. Jenkinson, and G. Anderson. 2003. Entry into the thymic microenvironment triggers Notch activation in the earliest migrant T cell progenitors. J. Immunol. 170: 1299–1303. 12538689
  12. [12]Schmitt, T.M., M. Ciofani, H.T. Petrie, and J.C. Zuniga-Pflucker. 2004. Maintenance of T cell specification and differentiation requires recurrent notch receptor–ligand interactions. J. Exp. Med. 200: 469–479. 15314075 PMC2211933
  13. [13]Jiang, R., Y. Lan, H.D. Chapman, C. Shawber, C.R. Norton, D.V. Serreze, G. Weinmaster, and T. Gridley. 1998. Defects in limb, craniofacial, and thymic development in Jagged2 mutant mice. Genes Dev. 12: 1046–1057. 9531541 PMC316673
  14. [14]Mancini, S.J., N. Mantei, A. Dumortier, U. Suter, H.R. Macdonald, and F. Radtke. 2005. Jagged1-dependent Notch signaling is dispensable for hematopoietic stem cell self-renewal and differentiation. Blood. 105: 2340–2342. 15550486
  15. [15]Jaleco, A.C., H. Neves, E. Hooijberg, P. Gameiro, N. Clode, M. Haury, D. Henrique, and L. Parreira. 2001. Differential effects of Notch ligands Delta-1 and Jagged-1 in human lymphoid differentiation. J. Exp. Med. 194: 991–1002. 11581320 PMC2193482
  16. [16]Hozumi, K., N. Negishi, D. Suzuki, N. Abe, Y. Sotomaru, N. Tamaoki, C. Mailhos, D. Ish-Horowicz, S. Habu, and M.J. Owen. 2004. Delta-like 1 is necessary for the generation of marginal zone B cells but not T cells in vivo. Nat. Immunol. 5: 638–644. 15146182
  17. [17]Besseyrias, V., E. Fiorini, L.J. Strobl, U. Zimber-Strobl, A. Dumortier, U. Koch, M.L. Arcangeli, S. Ezine, H.R. Macdonald, and F. Radtke. 2007. Hierarchy of Notch–Delta interactions promoting T cell lineage commitment and maturation. J. Exp. Med. 204: 331–343. 17261636 PMC2118717
  18. [18]Yan, X.Q., U. Sarmiento, Y. Sun, G. Huang, J. Guo, T. Juan, G. Van, M.Y. Qi, S. Scully, G. Senaldi, and F.A. Fletcher. 2001. A novel Notch ligand, Dll4, induces T-cell leukemia/lymphoma when overexpressed in mice by retroviral-mediated gene transfer. Blood. 98: 3793–3799. 11739188
  19. [19]de La Coste, A., E. Six, N. Fazilleau, L. Mascarell, N. Legrand, M.P. Mailhe, A. Cumano, Y. Laabi, and A.A. Freitas. 2005. In vivo and in absence of a thymus, the enforced expression of the notch ligands delta-1 or delta-4 promotes T cell development with specific unique effects. J. Immunol. 174: 2730–2737. 15728481
  20. [20]Wolfer, A., T. Bakker, A. Wilson, M. Nicolas, V. Ioannidis, D.R. Littman, P.P. Lee, C.B. Wilson, W. Held, H.R. MacDonald, and F. Radtke. 2001. Inactivation of Notch 1 in immature thymocytes does not perturb CD4 or CD8 T cell development. Nat. Immunol. 2: 235–241. 11224523
  21. [21]Tanigaki, K., M. Tsuji, N. Yamamoto, H. Han, J. Tsukada, H. Inoue, M. Kubo, and T. Honjo. 2004. Regulation of alphabeta/gammadelta T cell lineage commitment and peripheral T cell responses by Notch/RBP-J signaling. Immunity. 20: 611–622. 15142529
  22. [22]Mohtashami, M., and J.C. Zuniga-Pflucker. 2006. Three-dimensional architecture of the thymus is required to maintain delta-like expression necessary for inducing T cell development. J. Immunol. 176: 730–734. 16393955
  23. [23]Hrabe de Angelis, M., J. McIntyre II, and A. Gossler. 1997. Maintenance of somite borders in mice requires the Delta homologue DII1. Nature. 386: 717–721. 9109488
  24. [24]Duarte, A., M. Hirashima, R. Benedito, A. Trindade, P. Diniz, E. Bekman, L. Costa, D. Henrique, and J. Rossant. 2004. Dosage-sensitive requirement for mouse Dll4 in artery development. Genes Dev. 18: 2474–2478. 15466159 PMC529534
  25. [25]Rossi, S.W., A.P. Chidgey, S.M. Parnell, W.E. Jenkinson, H.S. Scott, R.L. Boyd, E.J. Jenkinson, and G. Anderson. 2007. Redefining epithelial progenitor potential in the developing thymus. Eur. J. Immunol. 37: 2411–2418. 17694573
  26. [26]Gray, D.H., N. Seach, T. Ueno, M.K. Milton, A. Liston, A.M. Lew, C.C. Goodnow, and R.L. Boyd. 2006. Developmental kinetics, turnover, and stimulatory capacity of thymic epithelial cells. Blood. 108: 3777–3785. 16896157
  27. [27]Tsukamoto, N., M. Itoi, M. Nishikawa, and T. Amagai. 2005. Lack of Delta like 1 and 4 expressions in nude thymus anlages. Cell. Immunol. 234: 77–80. 16095582
  28. [28]Benedito, R., and A. Duarte. 2005. Expression of Dll4 during mouse embryogenesis suggests multiple developmental roles. Gene Expr. Patterns. 5: 750–755. 15923152
  29. [29]Lehar, S.M., J. Dooley, A.G. Farr, and M.J. Bevan. 2005. Notch ligands Delta 1 and Jagged1 transmit distinct signals to T-cell precursors. Blood. 105: 1440–1447. 15486060 PMC2776671
  30. [31]Gordon, J., S. Xiao, B. Hughes III, D.M. Su, S.P. Navarre, B.G. Condie, and N.R. Manley. 2007. Specific expression of lacZ and cre recombinase in fetal thymic epithelial cells by multiplex gene targeting at the Foxn1 locus. BMC Dev. Biol. 7: 69. 17577402 PMC1906761
  31. [32]Kuhn, R., F. Schwenk, M. Aguet, and K. Rajewsky. 1995. Inducible gene targeting in mice. Science. 269: 1427–1429. 7660125
  32. [33]Saito, T., S. Chiba, M. Ichikawa, A. Kunisato, T. Asai, K. Shimizu, T. Yamaguchi, G. Yamamoto, S. Seo, K. Kumano, et al. 2003. Notch2 is preferentially expressed in mature B cells and indispensable for marginal zone B lineage development. Immunity. 18: 675–685. 12753744
  33. [34]Amsen, D., J.M. Blander, G.R. Lee, K. Tanigaki, T. Honjo, and R.A. Flavell. 2004. Instruction of distinct CD4 T helper cell fates by different notch ligands on antigen-presenting cells. Cell. 117: 515–526. 15137944
  34. [35]Rodriguez, C.I., F. Buchholz, J. Galloway, R. Sequerra, J. Kasper, R. Ayala, A.F. Stewart, and S.M. Dymecki. 2000. High-efficiency deleter mice show that FLPe is an alternative to Cre-loxP. Nat. Genet. 25: 139–140. 10835623
  35. [36]Beckers, J., A. Clark, K. Wunsch, M. Hrabe De Angelis, and A. Gossler. 1999. Expression of the mouse Delta1 gene during organogenesis and fetal development. Mech. Dev. 84: 165–168. 10473134
  36. [37]Klein, L., M. Klugmann, K.A. Nave, V.K. Tuohy, and B. Kyewski. 2000. Shaping of the autoreactive T-cell repertoire by a splice variant of self protein expressed in thymic epithelial cells. Nat. Med. 6: 56–61. 10613824

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Koch, U., Fiorini, E., Benedito, R., Besseyrias, V., Schuster-Gossler, K., Pierres, M., Manley, N. R., Duarte, A., MacDonald, H. R., & Radtke, F.
Affiliations
  • École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
  • University of Lausanne (CH)
  • University of Lisbon (PT)
  • 4Department of Biomedicine, Institute of Physiology, University of Basel, 4056 Basel, Switzerland
  • Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (DE)
  • Centre d’Immunologie de Marseille-Luminy (FR)
  • University of Georgia (US)
  • 3Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, 1300-477 Lisboa, Portugal
Venue
The Journal of Experimental Medicine
Published
2008-09-29
Volume
205
Issue
11
Pages
2515-2523
ISSN
  • 0022-1007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-9538
OpenAlex
W2050700188
Cited by
464
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 34
FWCI
11.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Experimental Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (110307)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Keywords
DLL4, Notch1, thymic epithelial cells, Delta-like 1, Notch ligands, thymus development, hematopoietic progenitor cells, conditional knockout mice
MeSH terms
Animals, beta-Galactosidase, Calcium-Binding Proteins, Cell Differentiation, Flow Cytometry, Membrane Proteins, Mice, Transgenic, T-Lymphocytes, Thymus Gland, Signal Transduction, Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins, Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing, Mice, Receptor, Notch1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review