The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Oscillatory Ca2+ Signaling in the Isolated Caenorhabditis elegans Intestine
Open accessAbstract
Defecation in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans is a readily observable ultradian behavioral rhythm that occurs once every 45–50 s and is mediated in part by posterior body wall muscle contraction (pBoc). pBoc is not regulated by neural input but instead is likely controlled by rhythmic Ca2+ oscillations in the intestinal epithelium. We developed an isolated nematode intestine preparation that allows combined physiological, genetic, and molecular characterization of oscillatory Ca2+ signaling. Isolated intestines loaded with fluo-4 AM exhibit spontaneous rhythmic Ca2+ oscillations with a period of ∼50 s. Oscillations were only detected in the apical cell pole of the intestinal epithelium and occur as a posterior-to-anterior moving intercellular Ca2+ wave. Loss-of-function mutations in the inositol-1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3) receptor ITR-1 reduce pBoc and Ca2+ oscillation frequency and intercellular Ca2+ wave velocity. In contrast, gain-of-function mutations in the IP3 binding and regulatory domains of ITR-1 have no effect on pBoc or Ca2+ oscillation frequency but dramatically increase the speed of the intercellular Ca2+ wave. Systemic RNA interference (RNAi) screening of the six C. elegans phospholipase C (PLC)–encoding genes demonstrated that pBoc and Ca2+ oscillations require the combined function of PLC-γ and PLC-β homologues. Disruption of PLC-γ and PLC-β activity by mutation or RNAi induced arrhythmia in pBoc and intestinal Ca2+ oscillations. The function of the two enzymes is additive. Epistasis analysis suggests that PLC-γ functions primarily to generate IP3 that controls ITR-1 activity. In contrast, IP3 generated by PLC-β appears to play little or no direct role in ITR-1 regulation. PLC-β may function instead to control PIP2 levels and/or G protein signaling events. Our findings provide new insights into intestinal cell Ca2+ signaling mechanisms and establish C. elegans as a powerful model system for defining the gene networks and molecular mechanisms that underlie the generation and regulation of Ca2+ oscillations and intercellular Ca2+ waves in nonexcitable cells.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The versatility and universality of calcium signalling
Berridge, M. J., Lipp, P., & Bootman, M. D. (2000) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/35036035 · Cited by 5,701
Cited by
McGhee, J. (2007) · WormBook · doi:10.1895/wormbook.1.133.1 · Cited by 324
Lionaki, E., Gkikas, I., Daskalaki, I., Ioannidi, M.-K., Klapa, M. I., & Tavernarakis, N. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-28272-1 · Cited by 56
Metadata
- Authors
- Espelt, M. V., Estevez, A. Y., Yin, X., & Strange, K.
- Venue
- The Journal of General Physiology
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 2005-09-26
- Volume
- 126
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 379-392
- ISSN
- 0022-1295 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-7748
- OpenAlex
- W2165335785
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Oscillatory Ca2+ Signaling in the Isolated Caenorhabditis elegans Intestine. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1085/jgp.200509355
- The paper
- Espelt, M. V., Estevez, A. Y., Yin, X., & Strange, K. (2005). Oscillatory Ca2+ Signaling in the Isolated Caenorhabditis elegans Intestine. The Journal of General Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.200509355
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.