Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,266

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

VLA observations of objects in the Palomar Bright Quasar Survey

Kellermann, K. I., Sramek, R., Schmidt, M., Shaffer, D. B., Green, R.·1989·The Astronomical Journal

Abstract

All 114 objects from the Palomar Bright Quasar Survey (BQS) have been observed using the VLA at 5 GHz (6 cm) wavelength with 18 arcsec resolution. The new radio observations typically reach a level of 0. 1 in the ratio R of radio-to-optical luminosity which allow radio emission to be detected from most of the BQS objects. Ninety six (84%) of the BQS were detected as radio sources above a 3 σ level of 0.2 mJy, and 75 (82%) of the complete sample of 92 quasars with M_B_ < -23 were detected. There appears to be no difference in the radio properties of AGNs (M_B_ > 23) and quasars (M_B_ < 23). The distribution of radio flux density for the BQS sample appears bimodal. Most of the BQS quasars are "radio quiet" and have a radio flux density close to that of the optical flux density, but 15% - 20% are "radio loud" and are much brighter at radio than at optical wavelengths. Only a few percent of the BQS sample overlap radio-selected quasars in the ratio of radio-to-optical flux density. Most of the sources detected with 18 arcsec resolution were reobserved with a resolution of 0.5 arcsec. For the optically selected quasars, we find an increasing fraction of compact sources with increasing redshift. We derive the radio luminosity function, assuming that it is either (a) independent of optical luminosity, or (b) a function of the ratio R of radio-to-optical luminosity. The statistics of radio detections of optically selected quasars in this and in other published studies are equally well represented by the two cases. The radio emission from high-redshift quasars (z > 0.5) is dominated by compact components; quasars with R > 100 mostly have small redshifts. The distinction between the radio-loud and radio-quiet quasars from this optically selected sample cannot be explained simply by the effects of geometry and relativistic beaming for objects having a fixed ratio of intrinsic radio and optical luminosity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/115207

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,266

Metadata

Authors
Kellermann, K. I., Sramek, R., Schmidt, M., Shaffer, D. B., & Green, R.
Venue
The Astronomical Journal
Published
1989-10
Volume
98
Pages
1195
ISSN
0004-6256 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2007714429
Cited by
1,266
References
0
FWCI
4.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: VLA observations of objects in the Palomar Bright Quasar Survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/115207
The paper
Kellermann, K. I., Sramek, R., Schmidt, M., Shaffer, D. B., & Green, R. (1989). VLA observations of objects in the Palomar Bright Quasar Survey. The Astronomical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/115207

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.