The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Automated star/galaxy discrimination with neural networks
Abstract
We discuss progress in the development of automatic star/galaxy discriminators for processing images generated by the University of Minnesota Automated Plate Scanner (APS) for cataloging the first epoch Palomar Sky Survey. Classifications are based on 14 image parameters computed for each object detected by the APS operating in a threshold densitometry mode. It is shown that a number of parameter spaces formed with these vector elements are effective in separating a sample into the two basic populations of stellar and nonstellar objects. An artificial intelligence technique known as a neural network is employed to perform the image classification. We have experimented with a simple linear classifier known as a perceptron, as well as with a more sophisticated backpropagation neural network with the result that we are able to attain classification success rates of 99% for galaxy images with B<=18.5 and above 95% for the magnitude range 18.5<=B<=19.5. The analysis presented here uses a training dataset consisting of 2665 galaxies and 2082 stars, along with a test sample of 936 galaxies and 2378 stars. We have determined the success rate of these classifiers as a function of image diameter and integrated magnitude. Simple numerical experiments have been conducted in an effort to illustrate the robust nature of this method as well as to isolate the most significant image parameters used by the networks in distinguishing image class.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
2MASS Extended Source Catalog: Overview and Algorithms
Jarrett, T. H., Chester, T., Cutri, R., Schneider, S., Skrutskie, M., & Huchra, J. P. (2000) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/301330 · Cited by 992
Data mining and machine learning in astronomy
BALL, N. M., & BRUNNER, R. J. (2010) · International Journal of Modern Physics D · doi:10.1142/s0218271810017160 · Cited by 383
Star–galaxy classification using deep convolutional neural networks
Kim, E. J., & Brunner, R. J. (2017) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2672 · Cited by 221
Surveying the reach and maturity of machine learning and artificial intelligence in astronomy
Fluke, C. J., & Jacobs, C. (2020) · WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1002/widm.1349 · Cited by 149
The Dawes Review 10: The impact of deep learning for the analysis of galaxy surveys
Huertas-Company, M., & Lanusse, F. (2023) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia · doi:10.1017/pasa.2022.55 · Cited by 102
“For example ANNs, decision trees and Self Organizing Maps (SOMs) have been extensively applied to the classification of stars and galaxies (e.g. Odewahn et al., 1992; Weir et al., 1995; Miller & Coe, 1996; Bazell & Peng, 1998; Andreon et al., 2000; Qin et al., 2003; Ball et al., 2006); an ANN being…”
Method
Metadata
- Authors
- Odewahn, S. C., Stockwell, E. B., Pennington, R. L., Humphreys, R. M., & Zumach, W. A.
- Venue
- The Astronomical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 1992-01
- Volume
- 103
- Pages
- 318
- ISSN
- 0004-6256 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4240017161
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Automated star/galaxy discrimination with neural networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/116063
- The paper
- Odewahn, S. C., Stockwell, E. B., Pennington, R. L., Humphreys, R. M., & Zumach, W. A. (1992). Automated star/galaxy discrimination with neural networks. The Astronomical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/116063
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.