The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Orbital coplanarity in solar-type binary systems: Implications for planetary system formation and detection
Abstract
The equatorial inclinations of solar-type stars within visual binary systems are computed by combining v sin i measurements with rotational period information, or with expected rotational velocities based upon the age of the star in question. These inclinations are then compared with the orbital inclinations of the systems to test the alignment between the equatorial and orbital planes, and how the tendency for or against coplanarity varies as a function of parameters such as spectral type, separation, eccentricity, etc. The results are extended to planetary systems in order to determine the appropriateness of basing planetary search strategies upon a parent star's equatorial inclination, and to address issues in planetary system formation and evolution, including the stability of planetary orbits within binary systems. During the course of this project new or improved v sin i measurements are made for over 30 solar-type stars within binary systems, and (for the purposes of the study) tentative orbits are computed for thirteen long-period systems. The results suggest that approximate coplanarity between the equatorial and orbital planes exists solar-type binary systems with separations less than 30-40 AU. The coplanarity tendency, as well as this 'critical separation,' is not significantly affected by most of the other parameters studied. The one significant exception occurs with hierarchical multiple systems, where noncoplanarity may exist at relatively small separations. If it is assumed that planetary distances in our solar system are typical, the results suggest there is no reason to expect planets to orbit in planes significantly different from that of the parent star's equator, in turn suggesting that planetary formation models and search strategies dependent upon this assumption are valid from this standpoint. The results also suggest that noncoplanarity between the components of a binary system is not a significant issue in addressing the stability of planetary orbits within the system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Stellar and substellar companions of nearby stars from Gaia DR2: Binarity from proper motion anomaly
Kervella, P., Arenou, F., Mignard, F., & Thévenin, F. (2019) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834371 · Cited by 399
Hot Jupiters in Binary Star Systems
Wu, Y., Murray, N. W., & Ramsahai, J. M. (2007) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/521996 · Cited by 196
Plavchan, P., & Bilinski, C. (2013) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/769/2/86 · Cited by 35
The Cessation of Eclipses in SS Lacertae: The Mystery Solved
Torres, G., & Stefanik, R. P. (2000) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/301290 · Cited by 27
The Rossiter–McLaughlin Effect in Exoplanet Research
Triaud, A. H. M. J. (2017) · Handbook of Exoplanets · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-30648-3_2-1 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Hale, A.
- Venue
- The Astronomical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 1994-01
- Volume
- 107
- Pages
- 306
- ISSN
- 0004-6256 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2060278163
- Cited by
- 476
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Orbital coplanarity in solar-type binary systems: Implications for planetary system formation and detection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/116855
- The paper
- Hale, A. (1994). Orbital coplanarity in solar-type binary systems: Implications for planetary system formation and detection. The Astronomical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/116855
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.