Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 498

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Palomar/MSU Nearby Star Spectroscopic Survey.II.The Southern M Dwarfs and Investigation of Magnetic Activity

Hawley, Suzanne L., Gizis, John E., Reid, I. Neill·1996·The Astronomical Journal

Abstract

Spectroscopic data for the southern stars (δ<-30) in the PMSU survey are presented. The data were combined with the data from Paper I [Reid, Hawley & Gizis, AJ, 110, 1838 (1995)] to obtain a list of all the magnetically active dMe stars in the survey. The incidence of activity increases monotonically toward later spectral type, reaching a level of 60% at spectral types >M5. This is not a selection effect, since the chromospheric activity level (LHα/Lbol) remains high throughout the spectral type range where the incidence is increasing. At very late types, there is evidence that the mean activity level drops in both chromospheric and coronal emission. The ratio between the chromospheric and coronal emission levels remains constant, indicating that the heating mechanism is not changing. There is little or no dependence of the chromospheric activity level on rotational velocity (υ sin i). The color-magnitude diagrams in both MV and MK show strong evidence for a break between spectral types M3-MS, in both the dMe and dM stars. The dMe stars at earlier types than M3 are about 0.5 magnitudes brighter than dM stars of the same spectral type in both MV and MK. They also are slightly (≤0. 1 magnitude) redder. Both the Hyades and IC 2602 clusters show the same absolute magnitude effect for the early type dMe stars. The Balmer decrement varies widely among the dMe field stars, in contrast to the Hyades stars. The photospheric TiO bands show detailed structure which depends on the chromospheric activity level of the star. These spectroscopic signatures will provide useful constraints on atmospheric models. A rigorous maximum likelihood analysis of the kinematic properties of a complete subs ample of the survey shows that the dMe stars are, as a whole, kinematically younger than the dM stars. Subsets of the dM sample also show that the early type dM stars are younger than the late dM stars, suggesting that the dMe phenomenon lasts longer in later type stars. This provides a natural explanation for the increase in the incidence of activity toward later spectral types.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/118222

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 498

Metadata

Authors
Hawley, S. L., Gizis, J. E., & Reid, I. N.
Venue
The Astronomical Journal
Published
1996-12
Volume
112
Pages
2799
ISSN
0004-6256 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2064024165
Cited by
498
References
0
FWCI
4.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Palomar/MSU Nearby Star Spectroscopic Survey.II.The Southern M Dwarfs and Investigation of Magnetic Activity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/118222
The paper
Hawley, S. L., Gizis, J. E., & Reid, I. N. (1996). The Palomar/MSU Nearby Star Spectroscopic Survey.II.The Southern M Dwarfs and Investigation of Magnetic Activity. The Astronomical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/118222

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.