Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 877

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A comet model. I. The acceleration of Comet Encke

Whipple, F. L.·1950·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

A new comet model is presented that resolves the chief problems of abnormal cometary motions and accounts for a number of other cometary phenomena. The nucleus is visualized as a conglomerate of ices, such as H,O, NH3, CH4, CO, or CO, (C,N,?), and other possible materials volatile at room temperature, combined in a conglomerate with meteoric materials, all initially at extremely low temperatures (<50 K). Vaporization of the ices by externally applied solar radiation leaves an outer matriz of nonvolatile insulating meteoric material. Quantitative and qualitative study shows that heat transfer through tiiin meteoric layers in a vacuum is chiefly by radiation, that the heat transfer is inversely proportional to the effective number of layers, and that an appreciable time lag in heat transfer can occur for a rotating cometary nucleus. Because of the time lag, such a cometary nucleus rotating in the "forward" sense will emit its vaporized ices with a component toward the antapex of motion. The momentum transfer from the kinetic velocity of the emitted gas will propel the nucleus in the forward sense, reduce the mean motion, and increase the eccentricity of the orbit. Such orbital effects occur for Comet D'Arrest; the mean daily motion of Comet Wolf I also appears to be decreasing. Retrograde rotation can produce an acceleration in mean motion and a decrease in eccentricity, as observed for Comet Encke. If the decelerating force component is taken as its maximum theoretical value, the present observed acceleration in the mean motion of Comet Encke can be produced by a loss of 0.002 of its mass per revolution. The corresponding mass loss for Comet D'Arrest is 0.005. For both comets the observed changes in eccentricity are obtained if the force acts proportionately to the solar energy flux but is cut off at a solar distance of about 2 A.U. A second paper (Part II) soon forthcoming will be concerned with the physical problems of comet structure, loss of meteoric and gaseous material, and correlations with observed meteoric phenomena.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/145272

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 877

Metadata

Authors
Whipple, F. L.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
1950-03
Volume
111
Pages
375
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2006186082
Cited by
877
References
0
FWCI
18.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A comet model. I. The acceleration of Comet Encke. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/145272
The paper
Whipple, F. L. (1950). A comet model. I. The acceleration of Comet Encke. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/145272

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.