Cited by 589Cosmology and Gravitation TheoriesGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaStellar, planetary, and galactic studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Primordial Element Formation, Primordial Magnetic Fields, and the Isotropy of the Universe

Thorne, Kip S.·1967·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

A detailed discussion is presented of homogeneous cosmological models which (i) have two equivalent "tangential" directions and one inequivalent "longitudinal" direction at each point in spacetime; (ii) have zero rotation; (iii) contain a perfect fluid obeying an equation of state p = p(p); and (iv) contain a magnetic field frozen into the matter and pointing in the longitudinal direction. By means of these cosmological models it is shown that, if the big-bang general-relativistic theory of the universe is correct, and if the galactic magnetic fields which are observed today were primordial in origin, then the universe was probably very anisotropic in its early stages These cosmological models are also used to evaluate the implications of astronomical observations for the isotropy of the universe. It is shown that the current 3 per cent limit on the anisotropy of the cosmic microwave radiation places limits on the large-scale isotropy of the universe, which are many orders of magnitude stronger than limits inferred from the observed isotropy of extragalactic redshifts Finally, an analysis is presented of primordial element formation in anisotropic cosmological models. One of the chief conclusions is this: if there has been a negligible amount of intergalactic H ii ever since the primordial photons were sufficiently energetic to ionize hydrogen, and if the universe is Euclidean but anisotropic in its large-scale geometry, then the current limit of 3 per cent on the microwave a…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/149127

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This is not unlike the situation in regular (isotropic) 4d open bubble inflation, where the inflationary spectrum is also modified at q O(1).

    “This is not unlike the situation in regular (isotropic) 4d open bubble inflation, where the inflationary spectrum is also modified at q O(1) [53,54,55].”

    From Observable effects of anisotropic bubble nucleation (2010) · cites this paper as [54]

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Thorne, K. S.
Corresponding author
Thorne, Kip S.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
1967-04
Volume
148
Pages
51
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2020396830
Cited by
589
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 18
FWCI
20.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Keywords
primordial magnetic fields, cosmic isotropy, cosmic anisotropy, cosmic microwave background anisotropies, anisotropic cosmology, primordial deuterium, galactic magnetic fields, perfect fluid cosmology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review