The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Theoretical Frameworks for Testing Relativistic Gravity.IV. a Compendium of Metric Theories of Gravity and Their POST Newtonian Limits
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“We have therefore shown that the strong equivalence principle holds exactly (in this particular case of a constant density “star”) in Nordström's “final” theory [1] [2] where F (Φ) = Φ.”
From Nordstrom's scalar theory of gravity and the equivalence principle (2011) · cites this paper as [2]
In the citing paper
“Nordström's final theory of gravity can be turned into a metric theory.”
From Nordstrom's scalar theory of gravity and the equivalence principle (2011) · cites this paper as [2]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Nordstrom's scalar theory of gravity and the equivalence principle
Deruelle, N. (2011) · General Relativity and Gravitation · doi:10.1007/s10714-011-1247-x · Cited by 59
Metadata
- Authors
- Ni, W.-T.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 1972-09
- Volume
- 176
- Pages
- 769
- ISSN
- 0004-637X
- 1538-4357
- Cited by
- 74
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
