The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Conservation Laws and Preferred Frames in Relativistic Gravity. II. Experimental Evidence to Rule Out Preferred-Frame Theories of Gravity
Abstract
Some metric theories of gravity single out the mean rest-frame of the Universe as a & & preferred frame." They include theories devised by Page and Tupper, Yilmaz, Papapetrou, Ni, Coleman, and Rosen, as well as a vector-metric theory studied in Paper I of this series. These theories would satisfy the "three classical tests" of general relativity, if the solar system were at rest in the "preferred frame." But instead it probably moves with a speed of 200 km -1 We use the new version of the Parametrized Post-Newtonian (PPN) formalism discussed in Paper I, to show that such motion may produce (1) an anomalous 12-hour sidereal tide of the solid Earth; (2) an anomalous yearly variation in the Earth's rotation rate; (3) an anomalous perihelion shift of the planets. We use gravimeter data, length-of-day data, and perihelion-shift data to put upper limits on the sizes of such anomalous effects. These limits rule out all the && preferred-frame" theories whose authors are listed above, and put an upper limit on the strength of a cosmological vector gravitational field. Other possible experimental tests of "prefen-ed-frame" theories are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics
Will, C. M. (2018) · doi:10.1017/9781316338612 · Cited by 3,637
Self-citationModern Tests of Lorentz Invariance
Mattingly, D. (2005) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2005-5 · Cited by 1,061
Tensor-multi-scalar theories of gravitation
Damour, T., & Esposito-Farese, G. (1992) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/9/9/015 · Cited by 1,016
Gravity with a dynamical preferred frame
Jacobson, T., & Mattingly, D. (2001) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.64.024028 · Cited by 944
Chern–Simons modified general relativity
Alexander, S., & Yunes, N. (2009) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2009.07.002 · Cited by 715
Metadata
- Authors
- Nordtvedt, K., Jr., & Will, C. M.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 1972-11
- Volume
- 177
- Pages
- 775
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2050746030
- Cited by
- 260
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Conservation Laws and Preferred Frames in Relativistic Gravity. II. Experimental Evidence to Rule Out Preferred-Frame Theories of Gravity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/151755
- The paper
- Nordtvedt, K., Jr., & Will, C. M. (1972). Conservation Laws and Preferred Frames in Relativistic Gravity. II. Experimental Evidence to Rule Out Preferred-Frame Theories of Gravity. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/151755
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.