The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Interstellar bubbles. II - Structure and evolution
Abstract
The detailed structure of the interaction of a strong stellar wind with the interstellar medium is presented. First, an adiabatic similarity solution is given which is applicable at early times. Second, a similarity solution is derived which includes the effects of thermal conduction between the hot (about 1 million K) interior and the cold shell of swept-up interstellar matter. This solution is then modified to include the effects of radiative energy losses. The evolution of an interstellar bubble is calculated, including the radiative losses. The quantitative results for the outer-shell radius and velocity and the column density of highly ionized species such as O VI are within a factor 2 of the approximate results of Castor, McCray, and Weaver (1975). The effect of stellar motion on the structure of a bubble, the hydrodynamic stability of the outer shell, and the observable properties of the hot region and the outer shell are discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Clearly, the outflow becomes slower quickly in the presence of a CGM over a time scale of ∼ Myr.”
From The Fermi/eROSITA bubbles: a look into the nuclear outflow from the Milky Way (2024) · cites this paper as Weaver et al. 1977
In the citing paper
“The dynamical time-scale of the actual expansion would depend on the speed of the shock driven by this hot gas and can be much lower (Castor et al. 1975; Weaver et al. 1977).”
From The Fermi/eROSITA bubbles: a look into the nuclear outflow from the Milky Way (2024) · cites this paper as Weaver et al. 1977
In the citing paper
“The higher value of σ compared to a blast wave case is due to a higher fraction of thermal energy stored in wind-driven bubbles (Weaver et al. 1977).”
From The Fermi/eROSITA bubbles: a look into the nuclear outflow from the Milky Way (2024) · cites this paper as Weaver et al. 1977
In the citing paper
“Shocks driven by a constant energy source (namely, winds) are also self-similar and can be represented by the equation 10 with the modification Eb = L t , where L is the power of the energy source (Castor et al. 1975; Weaver et al. 1977).”
From The Fermi/eROSITA bubbles: a look into the nuclear outflow from the Milky Way (2024) · cites this paper as Weaver et al. 1977
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 1,001
Strickland, D., & Stevens, I. R. (1999) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02494.x · Cited by 60
“Thermal conduction and mass loading both introduce cooler and denser material into the interior of superbubbles, which dominate the X-ray emission as the luminosity is proportional to the square of the density (c.f. Weaver et al. 1977; Hartquist et al. 1986).”
BackgroundInfluentialHighly Ionized Interstellar Atoms—Heated, Cooled, or Mixed?
Spitzer, L. (1996) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/309916 · Cited by 60
The origin of Galactic cosmic rays as revealed by their composition
Tatischeff, V., RAYMOND, J. C., Duprat, J., et al. (2021) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2533 · Cited by 59
Steiner, J. F., Reis, R. C., Fabian, A. C., et al. (2012) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.22128.x · Cited by 59
“This cone, in turn, is enclosed in a thin shell of even denser shocked ISM (e.g., Weaver et al. 1977).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialA RADIO-POLARIZATION AND ROTATION MEASURE STUDY OF THE GUM NEBULA AND ITS ENVIRONMENT
Purcell, C., Gaensler, B., Sun, X.-H., Carretti, E., Bernardi, G., Haverkorn, M., Kesteven, M., Poppi, S., Schnitzeler, D., & Staveley-Smith, L. (2015) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/804/1/22 · Cited by 27
“The Weaver et al. (1977) description of a bubble blown by a high-mass star predicts a shell-like H II region surrounding a region of shocked stellar wind.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialTanner, A., Ghez, A. M., Morris, M., & Christou, J. C. (2005) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/429214 · Cited by 58
“…and R W R respectively) for all these stars based on the standoff distance relationship R o = 1.74×10 19 ˙ m * 1/2 v 1/2 w v −1 rel * µ 1/2 H n −1/2 H cm (Weaver et al. 1977), where R o is the standoff distance, ˙ m * is the stellar mass loss rate – 9 – in units of 10 −6 M ⊙ yr −1 , v w is the…”
BackgroundInfluentialDistance and age of the pulsar wind nebula 3C 58
Kothes, R. (2013) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201219839 · Cited by 59
“With an average expansion velocity of 6.5 km s−1 this results in a dynamic age of 3.2× 106 yr for a pure stellar wind bubble produced by a single star (Weaver et al. 1977).”
BackgroundInfluentialHigh-resolution H I observations of the Western Magellanic Bridge
Muller, E., Staveley‐Smith, L., Zealey, W. J., et al. (2003) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06147.x · Cited by 59
“The poor spatial correlation statistic of OB associations and Hi expanding shells is contrary to the popular theory of the formation of stellar wind-driven Hi expanding shells (Weaver et al, 1977).”
MethodResultInfluentialThe evolution of planetary nebulae
Steffen, M., Schönberner, D., & Warmuth, A. (2008) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200809677 · Cited by 59
Velocity dispersion in the interstellar medium of early galaxies
Kohandel, M., Pallottini, A., Ferrara, A., et al. (2020) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2792 · Cited by 59
Forming massive seed black holes in high-redshift quasar host progenitors
Lupi, A., Haiman, Z., & Volonteri, M. (2021) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stab692 · Cited by 59
“Following Weaver et al. (1977) and Madau et al. (2001), we define the bubble radius as 𝑅bubble (𝑡) = ( 125 154𝜋 )1/5 ( 𝐿SN 𝑛mH )1/5 𝑡3/5 cm, (13) where 𝐿 = const is the average SN luminosity associated to the stellar population in the halo, 𝑡 the time since the burst of SF, and 𝑛 ≡…”
BackgroundSupernovae and the origin of the solar system
Clayton, D. D. (1979) · Space Science Reviews · doi:10.1007/bf00167709 · Cited by 59
The Orion Nebula in the Mid-Infrared
Robberto, M., Beckwith, S. V. W., Panagia, N., et al. (2005) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/428000 · Cited by 58
“This hot star originates a substantial stellar wind, and the formation of a internal reverse shock where the gas flows enter a subsonic regime is a natural outcome in the early adiabatic phase of expansion (Castor et al. 1975; Weaver et al. 1977).”
BackgroundA robust measurement of the mass outflow rate of the galactic outflow from NGC 6090
Chisholm, J., Christy, A. T., Leitherer, C., & Chen, Y. (2016) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1951 · Cited by 58
“This phase is called the snowplow phase, and the radius depends on the amount of injected energy, the density of the medium, and how much of the energy is radiated away (Weaver et al. 1977; McKee & Ostriker 1977; Cooper et al. 2008; ?”
BackgroundInfluentialPhysical regimes for feedback in galaxy formation
Monaco, P. (2004) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07916.x · Cited by 58
“(30) For adiabatic and PDS blasts, α2 = 1.61 and 1.18 (Weaver et al. 1977; Ostriker & McKee 1988).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialStellar feedback and triggered star formation in the prototypical bubble RCW 120
Stutzki, J., Tiwari, M., Townsley, L., et al. (2021) · HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · Cited by 58
AChandraX-ray survey of nearby dwarf starburst galaxies - I. Data reduction and results
Ott, J., Walter, F., & Brinks, E. (2005) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08862.x · Cited by 57
“Most of this energy is thermalized and indirectly can be traced by X-ray emission emerging from hot, coronal gas (Weaver et al. 1977; Heckman 2002; Strickland et al. 2002).”
BackgroundLehner, N., & Howk, J. C. (2007) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11631.x · Cited by 57
“The ionisation of the outer shell dependsmostly on the radiation of the central star (Weaver et al. 1977).”
BackgroundMolecular Superbubbles in the Starburst Galaxy NGC 253
Sakamoto, K., Ho, P. T. P., Iono, D., et al. (2005) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 57
van Marle, A. J., Méliani, Z., & Marcowith, A. (2015) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201425230 · Cited by 56
“The main sequence wind creates a large, spherical bubble of hot, shocked wind material, which expands into the ambient medium, sweeping up a shell, following the pattern predicted by the analytical model (Weaver et al. 1977).”
BackgroundInfluentialEVIDENCE FOR 1000 km s –1 MOLECULAR OUTFLOWS IN THE LOCAL ULIRG POPULATION
Chung, A., Yun, M. S., Naraynan, G., et al. (2011) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.1088/2041-8205/732/1/l15 · Cited by 56
“The energy injection rate (dE/dt) in a wind-blown bubble of a radius R expanding at velocity v into an infinite homogeneous medium with density n0 can be expressed as (Weaver et al 1977), dE dt ∼ 3.3× 1035R2kpcv 3 km/sn0,cm−3 erg s −1.”
BackgroundInfluentialRauch, M., Sargent, W. L. W., Barlow, T. A., et al. (2001) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/323523 · Cited by 56
“…density seen radially outward through the shell is Ns(H) = ns∆R = nR 3 = 2.75× 1016L1/538 n4/5−5 t3/57 cm−2 (14) The gas density ns in the shell is given by (Weaver et al 1977): ns = n Ṙ2 + c2 c2s , (15) where c is the sound speed in the undisturbed IGM and cs is the sound speed in the shell.”
BackgroundInfluentialRadiation-Hydrodynamic Models of the evolving Circumstellar Medium around Massive StarsPreprint
Toalá, J. A., & Arthur, S. J. (2016) · Cited by 56
THE FORMATION OF KILOPARSEC-SCALE H I HOLES IN DWARF GALAXIES
Warren, S. R., Weisz, D. R., Skillman, E. D., Cannon, J. M., Dalcanton, J. J., Dolphin, A. E., Kennicutt, R. C., Koribalski, B. S., Ott, J., Stilp, A. M., et al. (2011) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/738/1/10 · Cited by 55
“It has been suggested that these structures are created by feedback from stellar processes (e.g., stellar winds and supernovae (SNe) in OB associations; Weaver et al. 1977; Cash et al. 1980; McCray & Kafatos 1987; Tenorio-Tagle & Bodenheimer 1988).”
BackgroundSano, H., Tanaka, T., Torii, K., et al. (2013) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/778/1/59 · Cited by 55
“According to the numerical simulations that studied the interaction of the ISM with the strong stellar winds from an O-type star (Weaver et al. 1977), the gas density inside the evacuated wind bubble is ∼0.01 cm−3, which applies to the interior of the cavity.”
BackgroundInfluentialThe Ophiuchus Superbubble: A Gigantic Eruption from the Inner Disk of the Milky Way
Pidopryhora, Y., Lockman, F. J., & Shields, J. C. (2007) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/510521 · Cited by 55
Feedback by massive stars and the emergence of superbubbles
Krause, M., Diehl, R., Böhringer, H., Freyberg, M. J., & Lubos, D. (2014) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201423871 · Cited by 54
“The analogy between the dynamics of superbubbles and the one of winds with constant energy input rate (Weaver et al. 1977), which has been made in the literature, is inadequate in several respects: the X-ray luminosity is strongly linked to the time variability of the energy input rate;…”
BackgroundInoue, T., & Inutsuka, S.-I. (2016) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/0004-637x/833/1/10 · Cited by 55
SILCC-Zoom: The early impact of ionizing radiation on forming molecular clouds
Haid, S., Walch, S., Seifried, D., Wünsch, R., Dinnbier, F., & Naab, T. (2018) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2938 · Cited by 55
“The underlying physical processes are collectively termed stellar feedback, i.e. stellar winds (Castor et al. 1975; Weaver et al. 1977; Wünsch et al. 2011), ionizing radiation (Spitzer 1978; Hosokawa & Inutsuka 2006; Dale et al. 2012; Walch ?”
BackgroundThe geometry and dynamical role of stellar wind bubbles in photoionized H ii regions
Geen, S., Bieri, R., Rosdahl, J., et al. (2020) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3705 · Cited by 55
“Using equation (67) in Weaver et al. (1977) and making the simplifying assumption that this is a spherical shell, we can estimate the hydrogen number density of the shell ns = n0(vs/c0)2 (13) where c0 is the sound speed in the neutral gas outside, and which we approximate to be 1 km s−1.”
BackgroundInfluentialBursting SN 1996cr's bubble: hydrodynamic and X-ray modelling of its circumstellar medium
Dwarkadas, V. V., Dewey, D., & Bauer, F. E. (2010) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16966.x · Cited by 55
“One way to arrive at such a distribution is with a low-density wind medium followed by a thin, dense shell, as is often seen around massive stars (Weaver et al. 1977; Cappa et al. 2003; Chu 2003, 2008), and in the nebula around SN 1987A (Blondin & Lundqvist 1993).”
BackgroundMulti-frequency polarimetry of the Galactic radio background around 350 MHz
Haverkorn, M., Katgert, P., & Bruyn, A. G. D. (2003) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20030530 · Cited by 55
“Stellar wind from HD 20336 We use the interstellar windblown bubble model by Weaver et al. (1977) to estimate the time needed to blow a bubble of radius 6 pc with a stellar wind from a B2V star.”
HYDRODYNAMICAL SIMULATIONS OF A COMPACT SOURCE SCENARIO FOR THE GALACTIC CENTER CLOUD G2
Ballone, A., Schartmann, M., Burkert, A., Gillessen, S., Genzel, R., Fritz, T. K., Eisenhauer, F., Pfuhl, O., & Ott, T. (2013) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/776/1/13 · Cited by 54
“When spherical stellar winds interact with typical interstellar medium (ISM) gas (nISM ≈ 1 cm−3, P ISM ≈ 10−12 dyn cm−2), they are well described by the model of Weaver et al. (1977).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialBarnes, A. T., Glover, S. C. O., Kreckel, K., Ostriker, E. C., Bigiel, F., Belfiore, F., Bešlić, I., Blanc, G. A., Chevance, M., Dale, D. A., et al. (2021) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2958 · Cited by 55
A RUNAWAY WOLF-RAYET STAR AS THE ORIGIN OF 26 Al IN THE EARLY SOLAR SYSTEM
Tatischeff, V., Duprat, J., & de Séréville, N. (2010) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.1088/2041-8205/714/1/l26 · Cited by 54
“The radius of a superbubble can be estimated from the standard wind bubble theory (Weaver et al. 1977): RSB ≃ (22 pc)t 3/5 MyrN 1/5 ∗,30n −1/5 H,100 , (1) where tMyr is the time in units of Myr after the onset of massive star formation (assumed to be coeval for all stars), N∗,30 = N∗/30 where N∗ is…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialMAGNETIC FIELDS IN A SAMPLE OF NEARBY SPIRAL GALAXIES
Eck, C. L. V., Brown, J. C., Shukurov, A., & Fletcher, A. (2015) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/799/1/35 · Cited by 52
“Following Mac Low & McCray (1988) in treating a superbubble as as a large stellar wind bubble, we use the expansion law obtained by Weaver et al. (1977), r = ( 125 154π )1/5( Lt3 ρ )1/5 , where r is the superbubble radius, L = SN η νSNESN is the mechanical luminosity provided by the supernovae…”
MethodThompson, M. A., Urquhart, J. S., Moore, T. J. T., et al. (2012) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.20315.x · Cited by 54
“Weaver et al. (1977) predict that the radius of a wind-blown bubble should increase much faster than the thickness of the swept up shell when the bubbles are in their first expansion stage.”
BackgroundBeaumont, C. N., Goodman, A. A., Kendrew, S., et al. (2014) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/214/1/3 · Cited by 54
“Castor et al. (1975) and Weaver et al. (1977) extended this analysis to include the effects of strong stellar winds from O and early B stars.”
BackgroundNested Shells Reveal the Rejuvenation of the Orion-Eridanus Superbubble
Ochsendorf, B. B., Brown, A. G. A., Bally, J., & Tielens, A. G. G. M. (2015) · Leiden Repository (Leiden University) · Cited by 51
O vi , N v , and C iv in the Galactic Halo. I. Velocity‐Dependent Ionization Models
Indebetouw, R., & Shull, J. M. (2004) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/382186 · Cited by 54
“Weaver et al. (1977) modeled a conductive interface of a different kind, at the shell of a wind-blown bubble around a massive star.”
BackgroundInterstellar Bubbles in Two Young H [CSC]ii[/CSC] Regions
Nazé, Y., Chu, Y., Points, S., et al. (2001) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/322067 · Cited by 54
“The fast wind of a massive star can sweep the ambient medium into a shell and form a wind-blown bubble (c.f. Weaver et al. 1977).”
BackgroundResultHot Expanding Shells in the Envelope of the Sagittarius B2 Molecular Cloud
Martín-Pintado, J., Gaume, R. A., Rodríguez-Fernández, N. J., de Vicente, P., & Wilson, T. L. (1999) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/307399 · Cited by 53
Star Formation Regulation and Self-pollution by Stellar Wind Feedback
Lancaster, L., Ostriker, E. C., Kim, J., et al. (2021) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac3333 · Cited by 53
“…Rosen et al. (2014), and others, there are large discrepancies between observations of the hot gas pressure produced by winds and the classical Weaver et al. (1977) model, and in Lancaster et al. (2021a, 2021b), we proposed that energy losses due to turbulently mediated radiative cooling…”
BackgroundSridhar, N., & Metzger, B. D. (2022) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac8a4a · Cited by 53
“At later times t? tfree, the ejecta shell begins to appreciably decelerate as its swept-up mass exceeds that injected by the wind, causing the shell radius to grow more gradually in time, R∝ t3/5 (Weaver et al. 1977).”
BackgroundInfluentialMassive star cluster origin for the galactic cosmic ray population at very-high energies
Vieu, T., & Reville, B. (2022) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3469 · Cited by 53
“This collective wind terminates at the wind termination shock (WTS), whose radius can be estimated theoretically as (Weaver et al. 1977): 𝑅WTS ≈ 𝑁3/10∗ ( 𝑛ext 100 cm−3 )−3/10 ( 𝑡c 1 Myr )2/5 pc , (1) where 𝑁∗ ≈ 10 − 1000 is the total number of massive (𝑀 & 8𝑀 ) stars in the cluster, 𝑛ext ≈…”
BackgroundFirst ALMA Light Curve Constrains Refreshed Reverse Shocks and Jet Magnetization in GRB 161219B
Laskar, T., Alexander, K. D., Berger, E., Guidorzi, C., Margutti, R., Fong, W., Kilpatrick, C. D., Milne, P., Drout, M. R., Mundell, C. G., et al. (2018) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aacbcc · Cited by 54
“…the ambient medium; however, the precise degree to which this mechanism is operational and effective for GRB progenitors remains an open question (Weaver et al. 1977; Marston 1997; Moore et al. 2000; Ramirez-Ruiz et al. 2001; Chevalier et al. 2004; Krause et al. 2013; Smith 2014; Margutti et al.…”
BackgroundWall, J. E., Low, M.-M. M., McMillan, S. L. W., Klessen, R. S., Zwart, S. P., & Pellegrino, A. (2020) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abc011 · Cited by 55
“This method shows excellent agreement with theoretical predictions for wind bubbles given by Castor et al. (1975) and Weaver et al. (1977).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialLoops, Drips, and Walls in the Galactic Chimney GSH 277+00+36
McClure‐Griffiths, N. M., Dickey, J. M., Gaensler, B. M., et al. (2003) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/377152 · Cited by 53
“Press) Cioffi,D. F., McKee, C. F., & Bertschinger, E. 1988, ApJ, 334, 252 Crosthwaite, L. P., Turner, J. L., &Ho, P. T. P. 2000, AJ, 119, 1720 de Avillez,M. A. 2000,MNRAS, 315, 479 de Avillez,M. A., & Berry, D. L. 2001,MNRAS, 328, 708 de Avillez, M. A., & Breitschwerdt, D. 2003a, Rev. Mexicana Astron.”
BackgroundInfluentialBochkarev, N. G. (1987) · Astrophysics and Space Science · doi:10.1007/bf00637850 · Cited by 53
The X-ray-emitting trail of the nearby pulsar PSR1929 + 10
Wang, Q. D., Li, Z., & Begelman, M. C. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/364127a0 · Cited by 53
The radioactive nuclei and in the Cosmos and in the solar system
Diehl, R., Lugaro, M. A., Heger, A., et al. (2021) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia · doi:10.1017/pasa.2021.48 · Cited by 52
Aharonian, F., Ashkar, H., Backes, M., et al. (2022) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244323 · Cited by 52
Asymmetric supernova remnants generated by Galactic, massive runaway stars
Meyer, D. M.-A., Langer, N., Mackey, J., et al. (2015) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stv898 · Cited by 52
“We run these models with the same underlying assumptions as in Paper I, especially considering that the stellar radiation field is not trapped by the bow shock (Weaver et al. 1977).”
MethodDiffuse X-ray emission from the planetary nebula NGC 7009
Guerrero, M. A., Gruendl, R. A., & Chu, Y. (2002) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20020330 · Cited by 52
“At the interface between the shocked fast wind and the dense nebular shell, heat conduction lowers the temperature and mass evaporation raises the density of the shocked fast wind, producing optimal conditions for X-ray emission (Weaver et al., 1977).”
HOW SIGNIFICANT IS RADIATION PRESSURE IN THE DYNAMICS OF THE GAS AROUND YOUNG STELLAR CLUSTERS?
Silich, S., & Tenorio‐Tagle, G. (2013) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/765/1/43 · Cited by 51
“…that the leakage of the shocked wind gas through the holes in the expanding shell may solve a long time standing problem of the shell growth descipancy what implies that Weaver et al. (1977) model often overpredicts the sizes and expansion velocities of the wind-driven shells (see Oey 1996).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialFukuda, T., Yoshiike, S., Sano, H., et al. (2014) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/788/1/94 · Cited by 51
Complexes of triggered star formation in supergiant shell of Holmberg II
Egorov, O. V., Lozinskaya, T. A., Moiseev, A. V., & Shchekinov, Y. A. (2016) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2367 · Cited by 51
“We estimated the kinematic ages of the identified local H ii shells in terms of Weaver et al. (1977) model by the following relation: t = 0.6R/Vexp, where R is the radius in pc, Vexp – the expansion velocity in km s−1 and t – the age in Myr.”
MethodWall, J. E., McMillan, S. L. W., Low, M. M., Klessen, R. S., & Zwart, S. P. (2019) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab4db1 · Cited by 50
3D simulations of Betelgeuse’s bow shock
Mohamed, S., Mackey, J., & Langer, N. (2012) · Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201118002/pdf · Cited by 51
The Stellar Content of Giant H ii Regions in NGC 7714
Garcia‐Vargas, M. L., Delgado, R. M. G., Pérez, E., et al. (1997) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/303778 · Cited by 51
The role of presolar dust in the formation of the solar system
Huss, G. R. (1988) · Earth Moon and Planets · doi:10.1007/bf00056023 · Cited by 51
Davies, R. L., Schreiber, N. M. F., Genzel, R., Shimizu, T., Davies, R., Schruba, A., Tacconi, L. J., Übler, H., Wisnioski, E., Wuyts, S., et al. (2021) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abd551 · Cited by 50
“Oey & Clarke (1997, 1998) proposed that H II regions undergo energy-conserving expansion powered by stellar winds and supernovae (see also Weaver et al. 1977) until the internal pressure is on the order of the ambient pressure.”
BackgroundIRC −10414: a bow-shock-producing red supergiant star★
Gvaramadze, V. V., Menten, K. M., Kniazev, A. Y., et al. (2013) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1943 · Cited by 50
“Thus, the separation between the two stars should at least be as large as the characteristic scale of the wind-bubble created by WR114, i.e. (Weaver et al. 1977): Rb = 27 pc ( Lw 1036 erg s−1 )1/5 ( n0 1 cm−3 )−1/5 ( t 1Myr )3/5 , where Lw = Ṁv 2 ∞/2 is the mechanical luminosity of the star and t…”
BackgroundContinuous star formation in IZw18
Recchi, S., Matteucci, F., D’Ercole, A., et al. (2004) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20040536 · Cited by 50
“In this figure we can observe the classical twoshock configuration (Weaver et al. 1977): a forward shock is propagating through the ISM.”
MethodEffect of Cosmic Rays on the Evolution and Momentum Deposition of Supernova Remnants
Diesing, R., & Caprioli, D. (2018) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.121.091101 · Cited by 50
MacKenty, J. W., Apellániz, J. M., Pickens, C. E., et al. (2000) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/316841 · Cited by 50
Detection of the Winds from the Exciting Sources of Shell H [CSC]ii[/CSC] Regions in NGC 6334
Carral, P., Kurtz, S., Rodríguez, L. F., et al. (2002) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/339701 · Cited by 50
Dual Cometary H ii Regions in DR 21: Bow Shocks or Champagne Flows?
Cyganowski, C. J., Reid, M. J., Fish, V. L., et al. (2003) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/377688 · Cited by 50
“3+0.2 could result from relative motion between an ionizing star and its surrounding molecular material, analogous to elongated structures predicted for such stars moving rapidly though the more diffuse interstellar medium (Weaver et al. 1977).”
InfluentialEvolution of the X-ray luminosity and metallicity of starburst blown superbubbles
Silich, S., Tenorio‐Tagle, G., Terlevich, R. J., et al. (2001) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04288.x · Cited by 50
“Our description of the inner bubble structure is based on the Weaver et al. (1977) similarity solution, and assumes that the density n and temperature T profiles can be approximated by n = nc(1 − x) −λ, (12) T = Tc(1 − x) λ, (13) where nc and Tc are the central hot gas number density and…”
X-Ray Emission from an Expanding Supergiant Shell in IC 2574
Walter, F., Kerp, J., Duric, N., et al. (1998) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/311500 · Cited by 50
FEEDBACK: a SOFIA Legacy Program to Study Stellar Feedback in Regions of Massive Star Formation
Schneider, N., Simon, R., Guevara, C., et al. (2020) · Kölner Universitäts PublikationsServer (Universität zu Köln) · Cited by 49
Sushch, I., Hnatyk, B., & Neronov, A. (2010) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201015346 · Cited by 49
“…of Weaveret al. (1977) Rbub = κ ( 1 2 Ṁwv 2 w )1/5 ρ −1/5 0 t 3/5, (30) where κ is a numerical coefficient which, in the simple case considered by Weaver et al. (1977) wasκ = [125/(154π)]1/5, while in a realistic case it can be found from numerical modeling based on a stellar evolution…”
MethodDense CO in Mrk 71-A: Superwind Suppressed in a Young Super Star Cluster
Oey, M. S., Herrera, C. N., Silich, S., et al. (2017) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aa9215 · Cited by 49
“The hot, shocked gas flows away from the cluster as a superwind, colliding with the ambient ISM and forming a bubble that grows in an energy-conserving mode (Weaver et al. 1977; Mac Low & McCray 1988).”
BackgroundLiu, R.-Y., Murase, K., Inoue, S., Ge, C., & Wang, X. (2018) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaba74 · Cited by 48
“Following the treatment in the previous literature (Weaver et al. 1977; Faucher-Giguère & Quataert 2012; Wang & Loeb 2015), we consider the so-called thin-shell approximation for regionc, which assumes negligible thickness of the shocked ambient gases (i.e., Rcd;Rs) and that all the shocked gases…”
MethodHot phase generation by supernovae in ISM simulations: resolution, chemistry, and thermal conduction
Steinwandel, U. P., Moster, B. P., Naab, T., Hu, C.-Y., & Walch, S. (2020) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staa821 · Cited by 51
“…occur in a low density environment, subsequent explosion add mass to the shell and heat the interior of the bubble which can lead to the formation of ’super-bubbles’ (Castor et al. 1975; Weaver et al. 1977; McCray & Kafatos 1987; Tomisaka & Ikeuchi 1986; Mac Low & McCray 1988; Koo & McKee 1992).”
BackgroundGupta, S., Nath, B. B., Sharma, P., et al. (2020) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staa286 · Cited by 49
“For r ≥ Rts, there is a shocked wind region, which is separated from the ambient medium via a contact discontinuity (for details, see Weaver et al. 1977).”
Internal motions in OB associations with Gaia DR2
Melnik, A. M., & Dambis, A. K. (2020) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staa454 · Cited by 48
“The radii of the shells are supposed to be 30–150 pc and the velocity of expansion Vsh must be less than Vsh < 15 km s−1 (Castor, McCray & Weaver 1975; Weaver et al. 1977; Elmegreen & Lada 1977; Lozinskaya & Sitnik 1988; Lozinskaya 1999, and others).”
BackgroundThe trouble with the Local Bubble
Welsh, B. Y., & Shelton, R. L. (2009) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 49
Hirai, R., Podsiadlowski, P., Owocki, S. P., Schneider, F. R. N., & Smith, N. (2021) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stab571 · Cited by 50
Star formation around the H ii region Sh2-235
Kirsanova, M. S., Sobolev, A. M., Thomasson, M., et al. (2008) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13429.x · Cited by 49
“The process was studied theoretically by, for example, Weaver et al. (1977).”
Acceleration of cosmic rays and gamma-ray emission from supernova remnants in the Galaxy
Cristofari, P., Stefano Gabici, A., Casanova, S., Terrier, R., & Parizot, E. M. G. (2013) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1096 · Cited by 47
“The density inside the bubble is nb = 0.01(L636n190 t−22Myr )1/35 cm−3 (Weaver et al. 1977).”
BackgroundInfluentialThe Signature of a Wind Reverse Shock in Gamma‐Ray Burst Afterglows
Pe’er, A., & Wijers, R. A. M. J. (2006) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/500969 · Cited by 48
Super-Eddington Mechanical Power of an Accreting Black Hole in M83
Soria, R., Long, K. S., Blair, W. P., et al. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1248759 · Cited by 48
Bow shock nebulae of hot massive stars in a magnetized medium
Meyer, D. M.-A., Mignone, A., Kuiper, R., et al. (2016) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2537 · Cited by 48
The role of magnetic fields in the structure and interaction of supershells
Ntormousi, E., Dawson, J. R., Hennebelle, P., et al. (2017) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629268 · Cited by 49
“The analytical, self-similar description of the expansion of an adiabatic, spherical wind in a homogeneous environment gives a power-law dependence of the radius on time, R(t) ∝ t3/5 (Weaver et al. 1977).”
BackgroundVLBI Measurements of Plasma Turbulence Associated with the Cygnus OB1 Association
Spangler, S. R., & Cordes, J. M. (1998) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/306172 · Cited by 48
Álvarez, C. A. V., Kobulnicky, H. A., Bradley, D. R., et al. (2013) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-6256/145/5/125 · Cited by 47
“Weaver et al. (1977) derives (Equation 51) the radius of an interstellar bubble as a function of time t6 in Myr, ambient density n0, and mechanical energy injection L36, in units of 10 36 erg s−1 .”
BackgroundWatson, C., Corn, T., Churchwell, E., et al. (2009) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/694/1/546 · Cited by 47
Tsuge, K., Sano, H., Tachihara, K., et al. (2019) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaf4fb · Cited by 47
“We derive rotation velocity Vrot(Rij) at the radius of Rij by using equation (Weaver et al. 1977): Vrot(Rij) = VMagellan cosθijsinI , (B3) where Rij is the radius from the center on the plane of the galaxy given as Rij= √ x2 + (y/cosI)2, I is the inclination angle., The minor axis and major axis…”
MethodOsaka feedback model: isolated disc galaxy simulations
Shimizu, I., Todoroki, K., Yajima, H., & Nagamine, K. (2019) · Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stz098 · Cited by 30
“It has long been known that the solution for multiple SN events is qualitatively different from a single explosion (e.g., Castor et al. 1975; Weaver et al. 1977; Mac Low & McCray 1988; Keller et al. 2014).”
BackgroundChandraView of Kesteven 79: A Nearly Isothermal Supernova Remnant with Rich Spatial Structure
Sun, M., Seward, F. D., Smith, R. K., et al. (2004) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/382666 · Cited by 47
“As pointed out and discussed by Weaver et al. (1977), the WDS can be considered as a thin shell after the cooling in the WDS is significant.”
BackgroundThe Origin of Filaments in the Interstellar Medium
Rosner, R., & Bodo, G. (1996) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/310286 · Cited by 47
The Structure and Morphology of the Ionized Gas in Starburst Galaxies: NGC 5253/5236
Calzetti, D., Conselice, C. J., Gallagher, J. S., et al. (1999) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/300972 · Cited by 47
“…50% higher than the one derived for an expanding superbubble with the age and size given above and density of 12 cm~3 (Martin & Kennicutt 1995), using the self-similar solution of Weaver et al. (1977), and is more than sufficient to produce the observed X-ray luminosity (Strickland & Stevens 1999).”
MethodFeedback from quasars in star-forming galaxies and the triggering of massive galactic winds
Monaco, P., & Fontanot, F. (2005) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08884.x · Cited by 47
“The SBs expand according to the solution of Weaver et al (1977); they propagate into the hot pervasive phase, their (modest) interaction with the cold clouds is neglected.”
Haverkorn, M., Katgert, P., & Bruyn, D. (2003) · Leiden Repository (Leiden University) · Cited by 47
On the properties of H i shells in the Small Magellanic Cloud
Hatzidimitriou, D., Stanimirović, S., Maragoudaki, F., et al. (2005) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09124.x · Cited by 47
“In the ‘standard’ picture, H I shells result from the combined effect of hot stellar winds from O and B stars and of supernova (SN) shocks (e.g. Weaver et al. 1977; McCray & Kafatos 1987).”
BackgroundEnergy Crisis in the Superbubble DEM L192 (N51D)
Cooper, R. L., Guerrero, M. A., Chu, Y., et al. (2004) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/382501 · Cited by 47
“Previously, observed dynamics of bubbles blown by single stars or superbubbles have been compared with pressuredriven bubble models by Weaver et al. (1977) or variations of such models, and it has been commonly concluded that the observed stellar wind strength is too high for the observed bubble…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSuperbubble dynamics in globular cluster infancy
Krause, M., Charbonnel, C., Decressin, T., et al. (2012) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201220244 · Cited by 46
“This is the case for many standard situationsof interstellar bubbles (e.g. Weaver et al. 1977).”
BackgroundLong way to go: how outflows from large galaxies propagate through the hot halo gas
Sarkar, K. C., Nath, B. B., Sharma, P., & Shchekinov, Y. A. (2015) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stu2760 · Cited by 45
“The 105 K gas comes from the evaporation of the disc gas and adiabatically expanded wind material, and, the hot gas ( T ∼ 5 × 106 K) comes from the shocked ISM and wind material.”
BackgroundInfluentialHI shells in the Leiden/Argentina/Bonn HI survey
Ehlerová, S., & Palouš, J. (2012) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201220341 · Cited by 46
“The analytical solution (Weaver et al. 1977, lines in Fig.”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Weaver, R., McCray, R., Castor, J., Shapiro, P., & Moore, R.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 1977-12
- Volume
- 218
- Pages
- 377
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2089390834
- Cited by
- 1,736
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 49 · 2025: 74 · 2024: 77 · 2023: 70 · 2022: 81 · 2021: 73 · 2020: 67 · 2019: 58 · 2018: 69 · 2017: 52 · 2016: 68 · 2015: 47 · 2014: 76 · 2013: 70 · 2012: 64
- FWCI
- 11.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
- Keywords
- interstellar bubbles, stellar winds, interstellar medium, heat conduction, radiative losses, hot interstellar gas, stellar kinematics, hydrodynamic stability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review