Galactic abundances of neon, argon, and chlorine derived from planetary nebulae
Abstract
Mean neon and argon to oxygen ratios are found from planetary nebulae to be NeIO = 0.225 + 0.01 and ArlO = 7.0 + 0.5 x 10- . The mean ArICl ratio is 21.3 + 2.3, which results in ClIO = 3.3 + 0.5 x 10- . The errors quoted are internal, and arise mostly from observational scatter. The accuracy of these nebular abundances is now limited by the calculated atomic data. The NeIO ratio is probably the most accurate, and the CliAr, Cl/O the least. The external error imposed by the Cl cross sections is probably less than + 25%. If the three extreme halo planetaries are excluded, these ratios are constant among nebulae within the observational errors, so that the mean values have galactic significance. No variation in NeIO with galactic position is seen, except that the halo planetary Ha 4-1 is a factor of 10 deficient in Ne compared with 0. Comparison with other observations shows that these planetary abundance ratios are essentially solar. The observed ratios are in general agreement with the predictions of explosive nucleosynthesis; however, the measured Cl is a factor of 3-5 more abundant than the predicted values. The neon, argon, and chlorine abundances found in planetaries are apparently typical of the interstellar medium out of which the stars were formed. Since solar values for these elements are apparently not as well determined, the abundances presented here could be used to improve the compilations of "solar" or "local galactic" abundances. Subject headings: nebulae: abundances - nebulae: planetary
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A correlation is observed between Ne/H and O/H abundance in PNe in the Galaxy, LMC, SMC and M31.
“A correlation is observed to exist between the Ne/H and O/H abundance in PNe in the Galaxy, LMC, SMC and M31, within a small but probably real spread”
From The Dawes Review 2: Nucleosynthesis and Stellar Yields of Low- and Intermediate-Mass Single Stars (2014) · cites this paper as Kaler 1978
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Dawes Review 2: Nucleosynthesis and Stellar Yields of Low- and Intermediate-Mass Single Stars
Karakas, A. I., & Lattanzio, J. C. (2014) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia · doi:10.1017/pasa.2014.21 · Cited by 735 · see citing works
“…correlation is observed to exist between the Ne/H and O/H abundance in PNe in the Galaxy, LMC, SMC and M31, within a small but probably real spread (Kaler 1978; Aller & Czyzak 1983; Henry 1989; Dopita et al. 1997; Stasińska et al. 1998; Leisy & Dennefeld 2006; Stanghellini et al. 2000, 2006;…”
Background
- Authors
- Kaler, J. B.
- Corresponding author
- Kaler, J. B.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 1978-10
- Volume
- 225
- Pages
- 527
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W1985964977
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
- Keywords
- NEON, argon, chlorine, planetary nebulae, galactic chemical abundances, explosive nucleosynthesis, interstellar medium, solar abundances, atomic data uncertainties
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review