Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,272

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Analysis methods for results in gamma-ray astronomy

Li, T.-P., Ma, Y.-Q.·1983·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

The procedures in current use for analyzing the results of gamma-ray astronomy experiments are assessed. Two formulas are proposed for estimating the significance of positive observations in searching gamma-ray sources or lines. The correctness of the formulas is tested with the aid of Monte Carlo simulations. One formula is derived by immediately estimating the standard deviation of the observed signal NS; the other is derived by applying the method of the statistical hypotheses test.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/161295

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,272

Metadata

Authors
Li, T.-P., & Ma, Y.-Q.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
1983-09
Volume
272
Pages
317
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W1991111402
Cited by
1,272
References
0
FWCI
0.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analysis methods for results in gamma-ray astronomy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/161295
The paper
Li, T.-P., & Ma, Y.-Q. (1983). Analysis methods for results in gamma-ray astronomy. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/161295

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.