Cited by 123Cosmology and Gravitation TheoriesGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaTopological and Geometric Data Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.

The topology of the large-scale structure of the universe

Hamilton, A. J. S., Gott, J. Richard, III, Weinberg, David·1986·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

It has been suggested recently that the topology of a distribution of galaxies can be characterized by the mean Gaussian curvature per unit volume of surfaces of constant density. An expression is derived which relates the mean curvature of isodensity surfaces to the power spectrum of density fluctuations in the linear regime of Gaussian fluctuations with random phases. The result may be compared to real galaxy catalogs if the galaxy density is smoothed over scales larger than a correlation length. The implications of the result for understanding the large-scale structure of the universe are discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/164571

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Gott et al. (1986) and Hamilton et al. (1986) considered the genus of the level surfaces as a useful numerical invariant of the cosmic web.

    “Gott et al. (1986) and Hamilton et al. (1986) considered the genus of the level surfaces as a useful numerical invariant of this situation.”

    From Topological pattern recognition for point cloud data (2014) · cites this paper as Hamilton et al. (1986)

  • The first recognition that topological methods could be useful in this setting occurred in Gott, Dickinson and Melott (1986) and Hamilton, Gott and Weinberg (1986).

    “The first recognition that topological methods could be useful in this setting occurred in Gott, Dickinson and Melott (1986) and Hamilton, Gott and Weinberg (1986).”

    From Topological pattern recognition for point cloud data (2014) · cites this paper as Hamilton et al. (1986)

Citations

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

Cited by 123

Metadata

Authors
Hamilton, A. J. S., Gott, J. R., III, & Weinberg, D.
Affiliations
Princeton University (US)
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
1986-10
Volume
309
Pages
1
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W1968018748
Cited by
123
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Topological and Geometric Data Analysis
Keywords
large-scale structure, galaxy distribution, topology, Gaussian curvature, isodensity surfaces, linear perturbation theory, random phase, galaxy catalog, correlation length

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review